Re: [dev] [st] 0.2.1 is out

2012-02-15 Thread Martin Kopta
On 02/16/2012 01:19 AM, Aurélien Aptel wrote: Hi all, I've pushed a few local changes and decided to bump the version a bit. * support for dim/bright colors Great! Now htop does work out of the box. Thank you. * unfocused cursor is now visible with a different color Looks good. I like it.

[dev] Re: [st] 0.2.1 is out

2012-02-15 Thread Aurélien Aptel
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Aurélien Aptel wrote: > * support for dim/bright colors > * unfocused cursor is now visible with a different color > * using index >16 for default colors now works properly > * various code cleanup, rewrite, indented and named enum definitions. > * VERSION updated

[dev] [st] 0.2.1 is out

2012-02-15 Thread Aurélien Aptel
Hi all, I've pushed a few local changes and decided to bump the version a bit. * support for dim/bright colors * unfocused cursor is now visible with a different color * using index >16 for default colors now works properly * various code cleanup, rewrite, indented and named enum definitions. * V

Re: [dev] Wayland

2012-02-15 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:52:01PM +, Nick wrote: > > I disagree, presuming I understood you correctly. You just > draw stuff straight into an OpenGL buffer. Or get your > toolkit to do that. How is this not a reasonable thing to > do? Because it's the same attitude that makes X11 and termina

Re: [dev] Re: ... and then i go and spoil it all by saying somethingstupid ...

2012-02-15 Thread Jakub Lach
Dnia 15 lutego 2012 17:54 hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> napisał(a): > > Now you get sucked less, I guess. > > It's not a bug, it's a feature. Deleted relationship is debugged relationship.

Re: [dev] Re: ... and then i go and spoil it all by saying something stupid ...

2012-02-15 Thread hiro
> Now you get sucked less, I guess. It's not a bug, it's a feature.

Re: [dev] ... and then i go and spoil it all by saying something stupid ...

2012-02-15 Thread hiro
On 15.02.2012, Rob wrote: > On 15 February 2012 07:34, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> Fuck off. >> (It's the same I told my gf btw) > > Ha! That's a good one, people on suckless having girlfriends... Well, not any more actually.

[dev] Re: ... and then i go and spoil it all by saying something stupid ...

2012-02-15 Thread Christian Neukirchen
hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> writes: > Fuck off. > (It's the same I told my gf btw) Now you get sucked less, I guess. -- Christian Neukirchenhttp://chneukirchen.org

Re: [dev] Wayland

2012-02-15 Thread Nick
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:38:02AM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote: > In short, wayland manages to push everything including rendering onto > the client, which means it's just going to get harder to write graphical > programs without a toolkit. I regard this as a major flaw; this > 'design decision' can

[dev] Re: Adventures with static linking

2012-02-15 Thread Christian Neukirchen
Paul Onyschuk writes: > On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:30:05 +0100 > Christian Neukirchen wrote: > >> >> Last time I checked (6 months ago perhaps), it was not possible to >> build a full Xorg server without dynamic linking. Only TinyX works. >> >> The clients are no problem, they just get very fat. >

Re: [dev] Wayland

2012-02-15 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 04:15:54PM +0100, Bernhard Leiner wrote: > > I attended the talk and as far as I understood it, the Weston > reference compositor will provide some kind of interface that can be > used by alternative window managers. There was a question in that > direction at the end of th

Re: [dev] Wayland

2012-02-15 Thread Hadrian Węgrzynowski
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:28:28 +0100 Eckehard Berns wrote: >I might be wrong, but my biggest fear is that using Wayland means that >I'm getting the current desktop paradigm shoved down my throat. If I >understand this correctly something like dwm would be implemented in >the compositor (for the win

Re: [dev] Wayland

2012-02-15 Thread Bernhard Leiner
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Nick wrote: > Yes, that's what I got from the article too. Which would > mean that a dwm Wayland version would basically need to > implement the Wayland API. Meaning it would probably need to > be rather more than 2000 LOC. I attended the talk and as far as I unde

Re: [dev] Wayland

2012-02-15 Thread Nick
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 03:28:28PM +0100, Eckehard Berns wrote: > I might be wrong, but my biggest fear is that using Wayland means that > I'm getting the current desktop paradigm shoved down my throat. If I > understand this correctly something like dwm would be implemented in the > compositor (fo

Re: [dev] Wayland

2012-02-15 Thread Eckehard Berns
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 09:02:52AM +0100, ilf wrote: > "Programming X-Windows is like trying to find the square root of pi > using Roman numerals" - Anon > > http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Wayland-Beyond-X-1432046.html?view=print > > Has anyone managed to run it yet? > > Opinions? I migh

Re: [dev] ... and then i go and spoil it all by saying something stupid ...

2012-02-15 Thread Aurélien Aptel
Someone loves me on the internet! *hug back*

Re: [dev] ... and then i go and spoil it all by saying something stupid ...

2012-02-15 Thread Rob
On 15 February 2012 07:34, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Fuck off. > (It's the same I told my gf btw) Ha! That's a good one, people on suckless having girlfriends...

Re: [dev] Wayland

2012-02-15 Thread Paul Onyschuk
FOSDEM 2012 talk about Wayland [1] is more detailed I guess. [1] http://video.fosdem.org/2012/maintracks/k.1.105/Wayland.webm

[dev] Wayland

2012-02-15 Thread ilf
"Programming X-Windows is like trying to find the square root of pi using Roman numerals" - Anon http://www.h-online.com/open/features/Wayland-Beyond-X-1432046.html?view=print Has anyone managed to run it yet? Opinions? -- ilf Über 80 Millionen Deutsche benutzen keine Konsole. Klick dich nic