On Sun 15 Jan 2012 08:06:55 AM PST, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> If someone is unhappy that a bug was closed, issue a new bug. Closing
> a bug should be a final operation (in my experience this is one
> problem with the existing BTS that allow re-opening closed bugs, but
> re-opening closed bugs means y
On 12 January 2012 19:06, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> One of the most important things of such a tracker is decent mail
> integration in my opinion (as most trackers that have evolved in the
> OSS space recently suck very much when it comes to mail integration).
>
> One aspect of this tracker could be
On 13 January 2012 19:17, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> All you really need is a good mail gateway and a decent way to browse.
> A mailing list, with the archive accessible in source control of some
> kind, sounds absolutely fantastic. All you really need as far as
> metadata is a string for project name
On 15 January 2012 07:27, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 15 January 2012 00:26, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:
>> On 15 January 2012 00:52, Andreas Amann wrote:
>>> just to ask, do you happen to have the command "wmname LG3D" in your
>>> startup
>>> script or anything else which changes _NET_WM_NAME?
>>>
>
On 15 January 2012 00:26, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:
> On 15 January 2012 00:52, Andreas Amann wrote:
>> just to ask, do you happen to have the command "wmname LG3D" in your
>> startup
>> script or anything else which changes _NET_WM_NAME?
>>
>
> I actually do have "wmname LG3D"
> I'm not home right
On 13 January 2012 01:34, wrote:
> What set of features are a must for you?
It pains me to say this, but the best BTS I've come across is
https://www.pivotaltracker.com/
Seriously.
It has great Web interface and a decent mail integration. You really
should study this.
I think Github's issue
On 13 January 2012 02:06, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> One aspect of this tracker could be to start with a proper mail
> archiving system and then writing the web stuff on top. This would
+1 on decent HTML5 Web interface on a maildir or something. I think
this is a precursor to any project that wants
On 14 January 2012 00:28, Paul Onyschuk wrote:
> Right now best interfaces for issue trackers are search engines (e.g.
> Google "site:adress_of_bug_tracker interesting issue") and mail
> archives (Gmane and so on) in my opinion.
I don't think they are the "best interfaces". It's the only option a
It seems to me it might overly complicate things to build the issue
tracker into a mail system or into git.
The core functionality of tracking issues can be implemented in a meta-language.
For instance, you have one file per issue, and the issue files would
look something like this.
[timestamp]
On 15 January 2012 00:52, Andreas Amann wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 04:55:08PM +0200, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:
> > On 9 January 2012 16:34, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > ow, sorry, cross that out. I misread the question.
> > Even with the patch applied, the problem is still there.
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 04:55:08PM +0200, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:
> On 9 January 2012 16:34, Ivan Kanakarakis wrote:
>
>
>
> ow, sorry, cross that out. I misread the question.
> Even with the patch applied, the problem is still there.
> What I meant was, "nope, it doesn't fix it" .
> Sorry for
> I did not say once that I was doing this...
Perhaps you overlooked the word "maybe", so I'll still try to answer
-- disregard my rage -- with a question:
Why might you be interested in trying to help write one such suckless
issue tracker as requested on the webpage?
On 14 January 2012 16:16, Ahmet Emre Çepoğlu wrote:
> Why are you telling me this? I did not say once that I was doing this
> because I was bored.
He's just a (pretty lame) troll.
cls
On 1/14/12, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Maybe you shouldn't write software because you're bored.
>
Why are you telling me this? I did not say once that I was doing this
because I was bored. Only because people know more than me, I should
sit in the corner and watch? If that is actually th
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:52:17PM +0100, hiro wrote:
> Maybe you shouldn't write software because you're bored.
>
Can't think of a more educating alternative, really. ;)
I don't even remember sending this mail, sorry.
On 14.01.2012, markus schnalke wrote:
> [2012-01-14 11:54] hiro <23h...@googlemail.com>
>>
>> mail sucks
>
> ... the start of a flame! *yay*
>
>
> Please define what you mean with ``mail''.
>
>
> meillo
>
>
Maybe you shouldn't write software because you're bored.
> I attached a somewhat ugly patch to correct the behavior, [...]
Since I didn't like how this patch turned out I looked into this a bit
further. Attached is a less intrusive patch, once to tip and once to
6.0. I ran this patch for a day or so and didn't have any issues.
If no problems show up I
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:22:12 -0600
Hank Donnay wrote:
>
> I like the idea of maildir-in-git, it makes something like
> automatically generating a website trivial with hooks.
>
Maildir is a bit overkill in my opinion, just look at naming convention
[1]. If you want to use "file per message" form
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 11:54:58 +0100, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> mail sucks
>
It may very well be because I'm awake since yesterday, but (taking
into account the message you replied to) that was goddamn hilarious!
Thanks!
Peace
--
Pieter
[2012-01-14 11:54] hiro <23h...@googlemail.com>
>
> mail sucks
... the start of a flame! *yay*
Please define what you mean with ``mail''.
meillo
mail sucks
22 matches
Mail list logo
