On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 07:45:11 -0400
Kurt H Maier wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Le Tian wrote:
> > I did it, because just recently have met a guy, who was insisting that
> > it is better because this and that.
>
> And now you know: that guy was either an idiot or a troll. You are
>
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 01:45:54 +0200
hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I like his rationale. pre-aliasing and neuro-aliasing come to mind,
> but idiotic as it might sound the only technically clear term is
> really "not antialiased".
>
> I guess I (we?) should get a life :D
Probably. :D I like
On 6/11/11, Jacob Todd wrote:
> More ifdef crap? Now that's trolling.
Nope; I'm answering requests for a bloated upstream dmenu.
Top-posting, OTOH, that's definitely an act of a troll.
On 6/12/11, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> But resizing a pager's window will
cause it to reflow the text and confuse and annoy the user.
Note to self: patch dwm against X's "sloppy focus".
On 6/11/11, Peter John Hartman wrote:
> Why not just utilize dwm's tile mode and have each link open in a new
> window?
Presumably so you don't have to close a window after every article you
examine, and resize the search results window. If you're going to
resize the parent window every time befor
On 11/06/2011 22:35, Peter John Hartman wrote:
Why not just utilize dwm's tile mode and have each link open in a new
window?
I wrote a mouse button patch for surf, a while ago, that opens a new
window on middle mouse button à la Firefox. It also allows using the
forward and back buttons on m
On 10 June 2011 14:42, Rob wrote:
> It looks like it's been decided that X is the way to go, but before any
> code is implemented, I thought I'd just stick my oar in - what if we
> were to keep to the terminal and open a connection to an X server, if
> available, and simply query the modifier key
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 07:34:06PM +0200, Christian Neukirchen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I have been thinking about a Xanadu-style web browser (e.g.
> http://xanadu.com.au/ted/XUsurvey/pingshot.gif) where you have two
> panes, and each link opens in the other pane; this is especially nice
> instead of the
Hey,
I have been thinking about a Xanadu-style web browser (e.g.
http://xanadu.com.au/ted/XUsurvey/pingshot.gif) where you have two
panes, and each link opens in the other pane; this is especially nice
instead of the "click -> read -> back button"-cycle common when browsing
lists of search results
No, you wasted your time, you didn't have to read any of the previous or
future posts, you chose to.
On Jun 11, 2011 12:40 PM, "hiro" <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Le Tian made a question and introduced me to a new tiling window
> manager in one sentence. Everyone else in this thread is a fuckin
Le Tian made a question and introduced me to a new tiling window
manager in one sentence. Everyone else in this thread is a fucking
asshole for wasting my time.
More ifdef crap? Now that's trolling.
On Jun 11, 2011 11:33 AM, "Bjartur Thorlacius" wrote:
> On 6/11/11, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
>> On 6/10/11, Bryan Bennett wrote:
>>> So base your custom DWM on the earlier versions that didn't support
>>> multiple monitors. No trolling, just a suggestion.
>
On 6/11/11, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> On 6/10/11, Bryan Bennett wrote:
>> So base your custom DWM on the earlier versions that didn't support
>> multiple monitors. No trolling, just a suggestion.
>>
On a second thought, I'd rather not read over patches from since 2006.
Unless of course someone
On 6/10/11, Bryan Bennett wrote:
> So base your custom DWM on the earlier versions that didn't support
> multiple monitors. No trolling, just a suggestion.
>
That is in fact a sound suggestion. This possibility didn't occur to
me. I'll have to do some reading on Mercurial to figure out how to
sele
* h...@suckless.org [2011-06-11 09:33:24 +0200]:
> -while xsetroot -name "`date` `uptime | sed 's/.*,//'`"
> +while xsetroot -name "`date` `uptime | sed 's/.*,//'`
> do
was this intentional?
> Wait in fact I don't know what that means.
In fact, the word I wanted to use was 'preferences'.
;)
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Nicolai Waniek wrote:
> Or this person just has some simple privileges that are not met by dwm
> or any other window manager he knows of.
I frequently think about privileges unmet by dwm.
Wait in fact I don't know what that means.
> Kurt you should sometimes jus
+-- Kurt H Maier ---+
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Yoshi Rokuko wrote:
> > i don't like that line so far ...
> >
> > if i am in monocle layout i am often on a small screen
> > too small for tiling so i might want to see my windows
> > as a
Or this person just has some simple privileges that are not met by dwm
or any other window manager he knows of.
Kurt you should sometimes just simply shut the fuck up and go out and
get some life instead of pissing around and being unfriendly despite
naiveness of the question asked.
...
On 0
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Yoshi Rokuko wrote:
> i don't like that line so far ...
>
> if i am in monocle layout i am often on a small screen
> too small for tiling so i might want to see my windows
> as a stack ?
As far as I know, zoom() moves the selected client to the master pane
in tile
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Le Tian wrote:
> I did it, because just recently have met a guy, who was insisting that
> it is better because this and that.
And now you know: that guy was either an idiot or a troll. You are
probably now able to decide which.
--
# Kurt H Maier
what's the sense of line 2037 in dwm.c (tip)
2032 void
2033 zoom(const Arg *arg) {
2034Client *c = selmon->sel;
2035
2036if(!selmon->lt[selmon->sellt]->arrange
2037|| selmon->lt[selmon->sellt]->arrange == monocle
2038|| (selmon->sel && selmon->sel->isfloating))
2039ret
I did it, because just recently have met a guy, who was insisting that
it is better because this and that. I'm not a specialist to judge the
quality of any WM by browsing its code. So I hoped that ppl on the
mailing list do have enough competence and patience to deal with this
kind of easy and naiv
@ Le Tian, Calm down. You should have asked about our opinion about
WMFS and why you like it instead of if It is better or worse than DWM.
Always is interesting to know what other people are doing. I think it
is not trolling, you simply asked the wrong question.
Cheers.
Pmarin.
On Sat, Jun 11,
Well, Kurt, would you please exersize some patience with the idiots
like me and stop continuously making your point in the future. Make an
effort to be a bit more polite. I fully admit, that it was a mistake
to create threads like this.
Thank you for your opinions.
On 6/11/11, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:24, garbeam wrote:
> On 24 May 2011 21:44, Bogdan Ionuț wrote:
> > I find out it's related to commit 40ea9ad70440, and this dirty patch
> seems
> > to fix my issue.
> >
> > --- a/dwm.c2011-05-24 23:38:52.79994 +0300
> > +++ b/dwm.c2011-05-24 23:39:40.543000
Hello,
Yes I agree with you. I removed this part of code to get the previous behavior
(do nothing).
Thanks,
capitn
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 08:22:18 +0100
garbeam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 25 May 2011 13:26, Nicolas Capit wrote:
> > I think this part of the code comes from the "NetActiveWindow" feature
Hi,
On 26 May 2011 13:39, Nicolas Capit wrote:
> I just tried to change this part of the code:
>
> diff -r ba590e72eb2a dwm.c
> --- a/dwm.c Sat May 21 20:26:26 2011 +0100
> +++ b/dwm.c Thu May 26 14:33:45 2011 +0200
> @@ -442,7 +442,7 @@
> }
> else if(ev->x <
On 24 May 2011 21:44, Bogdan Ionuț wrote:
> I find out it's related to commit 40ea9ad70440, and this dirty patch seems
> to fix my issue.
>
> --- a/dwm.c 2011-05-24 23:38:52.79994 +0300
> +++ b/dwm.c 2011-05-24 23:39:40.54314 +0300
> @@ -582,8 +582,8 @@ clientmessage(XEvent *e) {
>
Hi,
On 25 May 2011 13:26, Nicolas Capit wrote:
> I think this part of the code comes from the "NetActiveWindow" feature added
> in
> hg recently.
>
> I just tried the current hg dwm version and now everytime I click on an URL in
> my mailer the tag changes automatically and go where firefox is o
30 matches
Mail list logo
