On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:13:47PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> "User agents SHOULD include this field with requests."
>
> SHOULD: "This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there
> may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore.."
>
> there is only one header that "MU
http://vimium.github.com/
bastards trying to cloning surf ;)
--pancake
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 11:13:47PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 5/18/10, Marvin Vek wrote:
> >> the user agent string is unnecessary
> >
> > According to the RFC, it's required.
>
> "User agents SHOULD include this field with requests."
>
> SHOULD: "This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED",
Hi,
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 07:10:21PM +0200, Troels Henriksen wrote:
> Here is a further improved link hinting script, which positions the
> hints better when the element is broken across lines, and prevents
> recursive invocations of hintMode(). (Sorry for not attaching it, but
> my nearby suck
On 5/18/10, Marvin Vek wrote:
>> the user agent string is unnecessary
>
> According to the RFC, it's required.
"User agents SHOULD include this field with requests."
SHOULD: "This word, or the adjective "RECOMMENDED", mean that there
may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Marvin Vek wrote:
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:35:43PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>> i think unnecessary headers are bad
>>
>> the user agent string is unnecessary
>
> According to the RFC, it's required.
And some sites will redirect you to a page saying "Firefox
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:35:43PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> i think unnecessary headers are bad
>
> the user agent string is unnecessary
According to the RFC, it's required.
> also it reminds me the recent eff research
> http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2010/05/13
Interesting..
--
Marvi
On 5/18/10, Marvin Vek wrote:
> Would love to hear what you think about it, and especially if this
> would be subject for implementation in the surf sources directly.
i think unnecessary headers are bad
the user agent string is unnecessary
also it reminds me the recent eff research
http://www.e
Hey all,
thought i'd throw up something i've been twisting my head around.
The following resources describe what the User-Agent string should be:
- RFC2616, sections 14.43, 3.8
- https://developer.mozilla.org/en/User_Agent_Strings_Reference
- http://www.useragentstring.com
