On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Can you use hg tip dwm and redirect its output to some file and send
> me the output, perhaps that gives us an idea what is going on in this
> new xorg server.
Hello Anselm -
Attached is my log from dwm hg tip, and my xorg-server info. Ple
hello
when was http://code.suckless/hg/dwm decommissioned in favor of
http://hg.suckless.org/dwm ?
cheers
--
Benoit Triquet
.''`.
: :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
`-our own. R
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:58:58PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> On 13 April 2010 23:29, Benoit T wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 03:55:46PM +0600, mikhail maluyk wrote:
> >> I have the same problem. After latest update on development version of
> >> debian, Xorg behaviour is insane. I'm not s
I'm running OpenBSD 4.6 and:
which arch
/usr/bin/arch
strings /usr/bin/arch
...
$OpenBSD: arch.c,v 1.11 2004/05/09 03:20:45 deraadt Exp $
which head
/usr/bin/head
strings /usr/bin/head
...
$OpenBSD: head.c,v 1.14 2007/10/31 16:29:50 jmc Exp $
... etc
So I think you may be missing something.
R
On 13 April 2010 23:29, Benoit T wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 03:55:46PM +0600, mikhail maluyk wrote:
>> I have the same problem. After latest update on development version of
>> debian, Xorg behaviour is insane. I'm not sure dwm is causing the trouble
>
> insane how? cpu consomption? event la
Or just learn to use your mouse? :P
On 4/12/10, Suraj Kurapati wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Jonas H. wrote:
>> how can I disable resizing windows with the mouse in non-floating mode?
>
> Good point. Why do we have 2 ways of resizing: (1) the traditional
> WIMP way of putting your
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 03:55:46PM +0600, mikhail maluyk wrote:
> I have the same problem. After latest update on development version of
> debian, Xorg behaviour is insane. I'm not sure dwm is causing the trouble
insane how? cpu consomption? event lagging? those are what i saw.
> though.
neither
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 02:57:15PM +0200, pancake wrote:
> Weird? It is like markdown, but for data.. Allows to map any kind of data
> structure on it.. This is much simpler, readable and expressive than xml.
>
> Where's the weird? A part from it supports many data structures?
The example given on
Related to this topic i recommend the reading of 'diablo'. A static binary
optimizer based on gcc. Its used mainly for kernel, but it basically rocks on
many other situations where a static binary is possible.
- Original message -
> I thought someone could find this link interesting:
>
I thought someone could find this link interesting:
http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2010/04/12/squeezing-every-last-bit-of-performance-out-of-the-linux-toolchain/
(I just flew over the blog entry which is why I couldn't figure out
whether the resulting binary contains the Gecko libs or only the
On 10-04-13 11:50 AM, Charlie Kester wrote:
On Tue 13 Apr 2010 at 07:24:31 PDT Anselm R Garbe wrote:
ignore
Since I read your message and have now replied, does that count as an
ignore fail?
yes
I, otoh, ignored the message...
no I didn't
I read it AND the replies.. and
fail
:/
djp
On Tue 13 Apr 2010 at 07:24:31 PDT Anselm R Garbe wrote:
ignore
Since I read your message and have now replied, does that count as an
ignore fail?
Ignored :)
- Original message -
> ignore
>
The only sentence I don't like in the wikipedia article is "JSON
syntax is a subset of YAML version 1.2".
If json is only a subset of YAML, it means the potential bloat is much
more important in YAML than in json.
Apart from that, I found the stuff in this page very readable (more
readable in com
successfully ignored
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 02:24:31PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> ignore
>
Weird? It is like markdown, but for data.. Allows to map any kind of data
structure on it.. This is much simpler, readable and expressive than xml.
Where's the weird? A part from it supports many data structures?
- Original message -
> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 08:21:21AM +0200, pancake wr
ignore
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 08:21:21AM +0200, pancake wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2010, at 8:51 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 08:29:56PM +0200, pancake wrote:
> >> what about yaml?
> > I know nothing about yaml.
> So, RTFM :)
Just skimmed over the wikipedia article, seems weird.
--
I
I have the same problem. After latest update on development version of
debian, Xorg behaviour is insane. I'm not sure dwm is causing the trouble
though.
--
Regards,
Mikhail
19 matches
Mail list logo
