Re: [dev] [st] goals / non-goals for st?

2009-10-03 Thread Aurélien Aptel
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Rory McCann wrote: > I just tried out ST, it seems to have very bad flickering issues just now. > ls-ing a large directory made it go horrible and vim was unusable. We have to use pixmaps to draw faster (I'm working on this) and handle utf8. Vim seems pretty usab

Re: [dev] dwm and -geometry

2009-10-03 Thread Eckehard Berns
> But I would be more happy if I could decide which windows would > remain floating when I turn to the tabbed mode. Although I don't think this is a good way to use dwm, the following patch to tip should make dwm put windows with user specified geometry into floating mode. diff -r 2bcd25cce4ab dw

Re: [dev] [st] goals / non-goals for st?

2009-10-03 Thread Rory McCann
I just tried out ST, it seems to have very bad flickering issues just now. ls-ing a large directory made it go horrible and vim was unusable. A feature I would like is clickable-links, that would be excellent. On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 05:48:43PM +, Jacob Todd wrote: > Going through the st goa

Re: [dev] [st] goals / non-goals for st?

2009-10-03 Thread Jacob Todd
Going through the st goals / non-goals thread I've compiled this list of: What st is going to do so far (Arg said so): - *good* xterm compliance - 256 colour support - filters that change colour and shit - server to save session in case you crash X - unlimited scroll back buffer and What people

Re: [dev] dwm and -geometry

2009-10-03 Thread Jacob Todd
On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 09:24:27PM +0200, Swiat R. Gal wrote: > > Or you could specify them as floating in config.h. Or even better, > > whatever program that is could leave the job of managing it's window to > > the *window manager*. > > Sure, it is a great slogan. But I would be more happy if I

Re: [dev] dwm and -geometry

2009-10-03 Thread quaker4lyf
urxvt wraps lines if the scrollback buffer is used. It supports utf8 as well. On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Swiat R. Gal wrote: >> Or you could specify them as floating in config.h. Or even better, >> whatever program that is could leave the job of managing it's window to >> the *window manage

Re: [dev] dwm and -geometry

2009-10-03 Thread hiro
I like the 9term On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Swiat R. Gal wrote: >> Or you could specify them as floating in config.h. Or even better, >> whatever program that is could leave the job of managing it's window to >> the *window manager*. > > Sure, it is a great slogan. But I would be more happy

Re: [dev] dwm and -geometry

2009-10-03 Thread Swiat R. Gal
> Or you could specify them as floating in config.h. Or even better, > whatever program that is could leave the job of managing it's window to > the *window manager*. Sure, it is a great slogan. But I would be more happy if I could decide which windows would remain floating when I turn to the tabb

Re: [dev] Suckless word processing solution?

2009-10-03 Thread Robert C Corsaro
Speaking of documents, does anyone know of a simple way to produce gantt charts? People use project at work, which isn't something I want to run. We use trac, so I'd like to just hook it up to that. A shell utility would be perfect.

Re: [dev] Trouble building wmii on cygwin

2009-10-03 Thread Robert C Corsaro
Suraj Kurapati wrote: On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Robert Latest wrote: But at work I'm sadly forced to use a Windows PC, but to do real work I've installed a Cygwin environment. I had the same problem at work, but thankfully they gave me a second desktop on which I installed Ubunt

Re: [dev] Trouble building wmii on cygwin

2009-10-03 Thread Suraj Kurapati
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Robert Latest wrote: > But at work I'm sadly forced to use a Windows PC, but to do real work > I've installed a Cygwin environment. I had the same problem at work, but thankfully they gave me a second desktop on which I installed Ubuntu Linux. I run wmii on the Ub

Re: [dev] Suckless word processing solution?

2009-10-03 Thread Szabolcs Nagy
On 10/3/09, markus schnalke wrote: >> otoh it would be nice if maths had a plain text representation with a >> proper formal language, well defined scoping rules, semantics.. and if >> one came up with a new construct he would define it inside the >> language > > Reminds me much of `eqn', which AF

Re: [dev] Suckless word processing solution?

2009-10-03 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-10-01 13:51] pancake > >* ved (visual mode for ed..like vim, but using ed, indent, etc.. that is >reimplement the basics of visual text editor using ed and other > scripts as backend) vi is the visual mode for ed (for ex, to be exact). It can also invoke arbitrary external progra

Re: [dev] Suckless word processing solution?

2009-10-03 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-10-01 18:50] Szabolcs Nagy > On 10/1/09, Robert C Corsaro wrote: > > But you'll have to agree that maths are impossible to do in plain text. > > s/impossible/inconvenient/ > > otoh it would be nice if maths had a plain text representation with a > proper formal language, well defined sco

[dev] [ANN] Rumai 3.1.0

2009-10-03 Thread Suraj Kurapati
Rumai 3.1.0 Ruby interface to the wmii window manager http://snk.tuxfamily.org/lib/rumai/ Rumai is a [1]Ruby interface to the [2]wmii window manager. Version 3.1.0 (2009-10-02) This release adds new methods, fixes some bugs, and re