Re: [dev] Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of suckless.org

On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:26:55PM -0600, Jack Woehr wrote: > And for your delectation: Conversation with Anselm R. Garbe of > suckless.org > > Definitely an interesting

Re: [dev] dwm number of clients pointless?

On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Antoni Grzymala wrote: > On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:44:57 -0700, Thayer Williams > wrote: > >>> Anyone disagrees that the number of clients indicating recently >>> introduced to dwm-5.6+ is pointless and should be removed again? >> >> It's a nice feature for monocle

Re: [dev] feature request: hide a/set client/s on key press

Recheck the tagging concepts. This is what you are looking for. If you want a minimal tilda, check yeahconsole. It allows to embed other apps apart from xterm. On Sep 14, 2009, at 3:26 AM, Jorge Vargas wrote: Hello, Recently I have been playing with a console client named "tilda" (http

[dev] feature request: hide a/set client/s on key press

Hello, Recently I have been playing with a console client named "tilda" (http://tilda.sourceforge.net/tildashots.php) it's main feature is that if you press a key it will hide, which by the way is totally broken with DWM as Tilda assumes you have only one instance of tilda running. So it minimizes

Re: [dev] dwm number of clients pointless?

I'm using it also for my recently updated clientspertag patch (see web) On Sep 13, 2009, at 10:44 PM, Thayer Williams wrote: On Sep 13, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: Anyone disagrees that the number of clients indicating recently introduced to dwm-5.6+ is pointless and should be re

Re: [dev] dwm number of clients pointless?

On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > Anyone disagrees that the number of clients indicating recently > introduced to dwm-5.6+ is pointless and should be removed again? It's crucial for monocle, but wastes space in other layouts. -- # Kurt H Maier

Re: [dev] dwm number of clients pointless?

On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:44:57 -0700, Thayer Williams wrote: >> Anyone disagrees that the number of clients indicating recently >> introduced to dwm-5.6+ is pointless and should be removed again? > > It's a nice feature for monocle mode, but I admit I don't see a reason > for it in any other mode.

Re: [dev] dwm number of clients pointless?

On Sep 13, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > Anyone disagrees that the number of clients indicating recently > introduced to dwm-5.6+ is pointless and should be removed again? It's a nice feature for monocle mode, but I admit I don't see a reason for it in any other mode. If it's not kep

[dev] dwm number of clients pointless?

Anyone disagrees that the number of clients indicating recently introduced to dwm-5.6+ is pointless and should be removed again? Kind regards, Anselm

Re: [dev] dwm: suckless way to monitor work hours

[2009-09-01 10:07] Niklas Koponen > > Or better yet, has anybody already implemented this kind of tracking? Just came across [0]. You may find this interesting. [0] http://www.joachim-breitner.de/blog/index.php?url=archives/336-The-Automatic-Rule-Based-Time-Tracker.html meillo signature.as

Re: [dev] wmii: open new windows unfocused

If you don't want to use sleep you can also listen for window creation events in the virtual file system, but there's still an annoying flicker. Someone could try to patch wmii as to control window creation differently, but I think noone here considered it worth it. On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 2:35 P

[dev] wmii: open new windows unfocused

Hi, is there any way to start new clients without giving them focus? Right now i use a workaround: $app & sleep 0.3s wmiir xwrite /tag/sel/ctl 'select up' Thanks. Dieter