On Jul 25, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> Thanks for pointing out this problem and here is what I'd propose
> instead, slightly different though. Instead of having g.c.w-m.dwm-wmii
> I'm in favor for moving the whole dev list archive to
>
> gmane.comp.misc.suckless
>
> instead. This
Hi there,
2009/7/25 Dmitry Maluka :
> Hello! Since merging dwm and wmii lists were merged into this list,
> Gmane newsgroups are somewhat broken. Here is my conversation with
> Wolfgang Schnerring, one of Gmane admins, from gmane.discuss group.
>
>
>> From: Dmitry Maluka gmail.com>
>> Subject: Ne
>From instruction on importing archives into Gmane
(http://gmane.org/import.php):
> Archives to be imported can be in one of two formats: Either a tar
> file of a one-message-per-file directory, where the files have names
> that increase numerically, or a Unix mbox file. No other formats are
> acc
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 07:57:38AM -0700, Thayer Williams wrote:
> That seems the most logical way to go, though I don't know why we'd
> keep the dwm archives and not the wmii archives--though I never
> subscribed to the latter so maybe I'm missing something.
It seems that old wmii newsgroup at G
On Jul 25, 2009 at 05:14 AM, Dmitry Maluka wrote:
> > Yes, I like that. g.c.w-m.wmii should be removed; g.c.w-m.dwm may be
> > left but marked as obsolete; the new group should be created with
> > importing the current dev suckless.org list archive into it.
> >
> > I'll ask other dev suckless
Hello! Since merging dwm and wmii lists were merged into this list,
Gmane newsgroups are somewhat broken. Here is my conversation with
Wolfgang Schnerring, one of Gmane admins, from gmane.discuss group.
> From: Dmitry Maluka gmail.com>
> Subject: Newsgroup for dev suckless.org
> Newsgroups: gm
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 02:09:58PM +0900, Alex Matviychuk wrote:
> I've been following the list for a while and I'm curious what everyone
> is using as their distro of choice? Also, which distro do you feel is
> most suckless?
>
> Personally, I run Archlinux on my home and work boxes, Rockbox on m
Kurt H Maier dixit (2009-07-24, 19:45):
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
> > Yes. That's exactly it. Gentoo is just Xubuntu with a bunch of random crap
> > in
> > /usr/local.
>
> At least Xubuntu keeps the random crap in /usr/local/. Gentoo seems
> to offer a pretty even dis
