I try to answer extra-uriel-like-friendly.
Why can't people stfu and do some work or try to learn how to filter
mails instead of argueing about such needless crap.
The old lists were mostly off-topic too. And especially the dwm-list
was used to announce other suckless(-like) projects very often.
Why can't people filter out messages with [OT] is the subject line?
--
Samuel 'Shardz' Baldwin - staticfree.info/~samuel
Maybe a bbs would be better. With plenty of sections! !!;)))
On Jun 11, 2009 8:19 PM, "Jeremy Jay" wrote:
Again, I know how easy it is to set up filters, and I've done it before,
but unsubscribing is an even more simple solution.
I think dev@ is pretty self-explanatory, it should be for bug re
Again, I know how easy it is to set up filters, and I've done it before,
but unsubscribing is an even more simple solution.
I think dev@ is pretty self-explanatory, it should be for bug reports,
patches, and other _DEV_elopment-related topics. Most people interested in
one of these are interested
There's always the archives. Unfortunately, because of the size of
peoples rants these days the off topic discussion is beginning to far
outweigh actual project related chatter.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 01:14:04PM -0400, Jeremy Jay wrote:
> As much as I love dwm and suckless projects in general, I
Gpdwin
On Jun 11, 2009 7:27 PM, "Robert C Corsaro" wrote:
Kurt H Maier wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Robert C Corsaro<
rcors...@optaros.com> wro...
Bah. The whole conversation is a little silly. I admit that I know
nothing.
The set of emails that every member of a list wants to read is
different, the only solution to make everyone happy would be to have
one list per-email (or perhaps one list per-thread, if you are really
optimistic and tolerant).
As an alternative one can setup filters or use the Delete button (or
d
Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Robert C Corsaro wrote:
Do you know?
No, that's why I generally avoid pontificating about it.
Bah. The whole conversation is a little silly. I admit that I know
nothing.
I'd suggest taking a look at hackers@ and wiki@, which will at least
keep you abreast of code changes and any patches that get added to the
website.
--
Samuel 'Shardz' Baldwin - staticfree.info/~samuel
As much as I love dwm and suckless projects in general, I could really
do without all the off-topic conversations by the same 10 people. If
there will not be split suckless-dev/suckless-discussion lists I will be
unsubscribing. I hate to miss all the good code and patches, but I also
hate dealing
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Robert C Corsaro wrote:
> Do you know?
No, that's why I generally avoid pontificating about it.
--
# Kurt H Maier
Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Robert C Corsaro wrote:
I don't know.
That's about what I figured
Do you know?
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Robert C Corsaro wrote:
> I don't know.
That's about what I figured
--
# Kurt H Maier
Kurt H Maier wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Robert C Corsaro wrote:
One problem I see in the US, is that people don't even vote to fulfill their
own needs. �That would be an improvement over what we have now. �When the US
elected Bush, was that to satisfy their own needs? �I would ar
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Robert C Corsaro wrote:
> One problem I see in the US, is that people don't even vote to fulfill their
> own needs. That would be an improvement over what we have now. When the US
> elected Bush, was that to satisfy their own needs? I would argue that he
> only s
Max Fischer wrote:
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 11:09:51PM +, pancake wrote:
Wyrmskull said:
I don't think people know what's better for them.
I bet that nothing good would come from a Facebook-like govt.
If truely applied, democracy it's still the best tecnique we have to
balance the e
El Wed, Jun 10, 2009 11:21:28PM +0200, Uriel escribió:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > On 6/8/09, Uriel wrote:
> >> I forgot to mention that the German Pirate Party has taken a more
> >> 'expansive' approach to their positions, and that actually has put off
> >> a few pe
17 matches
Mail list logo
