Backports "bot" not running?

Is the automated backports script no longer running? I notice the Approved changes have not been merged. Is that something we can get running again? Thanks Mark

Re: Backports "bot" not running?

Hi, It is due to the migration of svn-qavm to the new host as requested by ASF Infra. I'll look into it right away, it has been on my todo list since last week, sorry! /Daniel Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 12:44 skrev Mark Phippard : > Is the automated backports script no longer running? I notice the >

Re: Backports "bot" not running?

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 7:00 AM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > Hi, > It is due to the migration of svn-qavm to the new host as requested by ASF > Infra. I'll look into it right away, it has been on my todo list since last > week, sorry! > /Daniel Thanks. We will want it to get this release process

Re: Backports "bot" not running?

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 7:05 AM Mark Phippard wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 7:00 AM Daniel Sahlberg > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > It is due to the migration of svn-qavm to the new host as requested by > ASF Infra. I'll look into it right away, it has been on my todo list since > last week, sorry!

Re: Backports "bot" not running?

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 8:50 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 7:05 AM Mark Phippard wrote: >> >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 7:00 AM Daniel Sahlberg >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > It is due to the migration of svn-qavm to the new host as requested by ASF >> > Infra. I'll look into

Re: Backports "bot" not running?

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 9:05 AM Mark Phippard wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 8:50 AM Nathan Hartman > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 7:05 AM Mark Phippard wrote: > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 7:00 AM Daniel Sahlberg > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > Hi, > >> > It is due to the migratio

Re: Backports "bot" not running?

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 09:35:51AM -0400, Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 9:05 AM Mark Phippard wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 8:50 AM Nathan Hartman > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 7:05 AM Mark Phippard wrote: > > >> > > >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 7:00 AM

Re: Backports "bot" not running?

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 9:46 AM Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 09:35:51AM -0400, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 9:05 AM Mark Phippard > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 8:50 AM Nathan Hartman < > hartman.nat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On S

Re: Backports "bot" not running?

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 9:53 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 9:46 AM Stefan Sperling wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 09:35:51AM -0400, Nathan Hartman wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 9:05 AM Mark Phippard >> wrote: >> > > >> > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 8:50 AM Nathan H

Re: Backports "bot" not running?

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 9:53 AM Nathan Hartman wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 9:46 AM Stefan Sperling wrote: >> >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 09:35:51AM -0400, Nathan Hartman wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 9:05 AM Mark Phippard wrote: >> > > >> > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 8:50 AM Nathan Ha

Re: Backports "bot" not running?

Mark Phippard wrote on Sun, 27 Mar 2022 14:06 +00:00: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 9:53 AM Nathan Hartman > wrote: >> >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 9:46 AM Stefan Sperling wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 09:35:51AM -0400, Nathan Hartman wrote: >>> > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 9:05 AM Mark Phippard

Re: svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS

Thanks for these two changes! The information is duplicated in ; anyone wants to fix that, too? (Also, 1.14.x is absent from there.) dsahlb...@apache.org wrote on Sun, 27 Mar 2022 16:14 +00:00: > Author: dsahlberg > Date: Sun

Re: Backports "bot" not running?

Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 19:33 skrev Daniel Shahaf : > It's not mutually exclusive; someone can run the script locally. I'd > recommend > to run merge-approved-backport.py without arguments. > Fails for me: [[[ $ ./tools/dist/merge-approved-backports.py Failed to parse entry ' * r1881534 (without

Re: Backports "bot" not running?

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 1:45 PM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 19:33 skrev Daniel Shahaf : >> >> It's not mutually exclusive; someone can run the script locally. I'd >> recommend >> to run merge-approved-backport.py without arguments. > > > Fails for me: > [[[ > $ ./tools/dis

Re: Backports "bot" not running?

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 1:45 PM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 19:33 skrev Daniel Shahaf : >> >> It's not mutually exclusive; someone can run the script locally. I'd >> recommend >> to run merge-approved-backport.py without arguments. > > > Fails for me: > [[[ > $ ./tools/dis

Re: Backports "bot" not running?

Mark Phippard wrote on Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 13:56:51 -0400: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 1:45 PM Daniel Sahlberg > wrote: > > > > Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 19:33 skrev Daniel Shahaf : > >> > >> It's not mutually exclusive; someone can run the script locally. I'd > >> recommend > >> to run merge-appro

Re: Backports "bot" not running?

Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 13:05 skrev Mark Phippard : > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 7:00 AM Daniel Sahlberg > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > It is due to the migration of svn-qavm to the new host as requested by > ASF Infra. I'll look into it right away, it has been on my todo list since > last week, sorry! >

Re: Backports "bot" not running?

On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 3:35 PM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 13:05 skrev Mark Phippard : >> >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 7:00 AM Daniel Sahlberg >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > It is due to the migration of svn-qavm to the new host as requested by ASF >> > Infra. I'll look into

davautocheck failing on 1.14.x

This backport broke this script for me: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1899256 davautocheck.sh: Adding groups for mod_authz_svn tests AH00526: Syntax error on line 161 of /home/markphip/subversion-1.14.2/subversion/tests/cmdline/httpd-20220327-200833/cfg: AuthzSVNAccess

Re: davautocheck failing on 1.14.x

e/markphip/subversion-1.14.2/subversion/tests/cmdline/httpd-20220327-200833/cfg: > AuthzSVNAccessFile and AuthzSVNReposRelativeAccessFile directives are > mutually exclusive. > davautocheck.sh: Configuration file didn't pass the check, most likely > modules couldn't be loaded >

Re: svn commit: r1899249 - /subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS

Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 19:00 skrev : > Author: dsahlberg > Date: Sun Mar 27 16:59:59 2022 > New Revision: 1899249 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1899249&view=rev > Log: > * STATUS: Block r1897441 since it doesn't apply cleanly > > Modified: > subversion/branches/1.14.x/STATUS > > M

Re: svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS

Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 19:37 skrev Daniel Shahaf : > Thanks for these two changes! The information is duplicated in > ; > anyone wants to fix that, too? (Also, 1.14.x is absent from there.) > Done (r1899267). This should be

Re: svn commit: r1899247 - /subversion/branches/1.13.x/STATUS

Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Sun, 27 Mar 2022 23:30 +00:00: > Den sön 27 mars 2022 kl 19:37 skrev Daniel Shahaf : > >> Thanks for these two changes! The information is duplicated in >> ; >> anyone wants to fix that, too? (Also, 1.1

Re: Pristines-on-demand: printing progress notifications

On 24 Mar 2022, Julian Foad wrote: For 'svn diff' especially, if we don't print the notifications, then we miss out on informing the user during one of the times when it could be particularly valuable to them. (They are waiting for diff output, which previously in svn used to come quickly.) I