On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 9:46 AM Stefan Sperling <s...@elego.de> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 09:35:51AM -0400, Nathan Hartman wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 9:05 AM Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 8:50 AM Nathan Hartman < > hartman.nat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 7:05 AM Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 7:00 AM Daniel Sahlberg > > > >> <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > Hi, > > > >> > It is due to the migration of svn-qavm to the new host as > requested by ASF Infra. I'll look into it right away, it has been on my > todo list since last week, sorry! > > > >> > /Daniel > > > >> > > > >> Thanks. We will want it to get this release process completed but in > > > >> the near term once this first batch of backports are merged I am > > > >> hoping that will make all of the tests on the branch run > successfully > > > >> again. > > > > > > > > > > > > Not sure if you're referring to the buildbots here but that's the > other broken important thing. I'll try to look into it soon. I think I can > get most of the buildbots running by commenting a few lines and renaming a > file. > > > > > > I am sure it would be nice to have the buildbots running if they are > > > not, but I will run the tests locally before posting any tarballs so I > > > do not feel like I need these to do the release. > > > > > > I was only referencing our automated backport script which merges > > > approved changes. That is not happening at the moment so the branches > > > are not being updated with approved changes. > > > > > > Since the 1.14.x branch currently has test failures when I run locally > > > I was just hoping to see a clean run happen so I know we are in better > > > shape to start progressing towards a release. > > > > Last night I ran the tests on 1.14.x with the following merged and all > > tests passed for me: > > > > r1877310 r1883355 r1878379 r1883719 r1883722 r1884610 r1881534 > > r1883838 r1883989 r1886460 r1886582 r1887641 r1890013 r1889629 > > r1892470 r1892471 r1892541 r1894734 r1897449 r1898633 r1899227 > > > > So hopefully all those (or the subset that fixes the broken tests) > > will be approved and merged soon... > > Anyone should feel free to merge+commit approved changes. > I have often bypassed the backport merge bot while doing RM work. > This bot is just a nice-to-have convenience and its absence should not > prevent us from making progress. > > Cheers, > Stefan > Thanks for mentioning that. I secretly planned to do exactly that if we didn't get svn-role working in time. Now if it comes to that, I won't have to feel bad about it. :-) Cheers Nathan
