On 07.01.2019 16:35, s...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Mon Jan 7 15:35:01 2019
> New Revision: 1850659
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1850659&view=rev
> Log:
> * STATUS: Nominate r1850651.
>
> Modified:
> subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
Why this (and the 1.8.x) nominat
Branko Čibej wrote:
> Why this (and the 1.8.x) nomination?
It's useful information, to a few people. In this case, Stefan can answer for
himself, but I guess he had done most of the work anyway and might as well
record the result of it. In general, if somebody wants to do the work
nominating an
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 09:18:21AM +, Julian Foad wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote:
> > Why this (and the 1.8.x) nomination?
>
> It's useful information, to a few people. In this case, Stefan can answer for
> himself, but I guess he had done most of the work anyway and might as well
> record the re
On 08.01.2019 11:45, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 09:18:21AM +, Julian Foad wrote:
>> Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> Why this (and the 1.8.x) nomination?
>> It's useful information, to a few people. In this case, Stefan can answer for
>> himself, but I guess he had done most of the
Stefan Sperling wrote on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 11:45 +0100:
> I mainly wanted to see how far back the patch would merge cleanly to get
> some idea how old this bug really is :)
Well, for whatever it's worth:
% svn praise subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c | grep hmm
844512 gstein /* ### hmm. the FS
danie...@apache.org wrote on Tue, 08 Jan 2019 12:03 +:
> Log:
> * tools/upcoming.py
> (copyfrom_revision_of_previous_tag_of_this_stable_branch):
> Determine the latest release by checking dist/release/, not by checking
> tags, in order to also show changes that have been merged into a
On 08.01.2019 19:45, stevek...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: steveking
> Date: Tue Jan 8 18:45:45 2019
> New Revision: 1850781
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1850781&view=rev
> Log:
> Extend the blame callback with a string length parameter.
>
> * subversion/incluce/svn_client.h
> * subve
On 07.01.2019 13:46, Julian Foad wrote:
> The 1.9.10 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there.
Do we always create tarballs from a branch export instead of the tag
Summary:
+1 to release (Unix)
Verified:
- Tarball contents and signatures
- check ((fsfs, bdb) × (local, svnserve, dav))
- check-all-javahl
- check-swig-py
- check-swig-rb
- check-swig-pl
New issues:
- 'make check-javahl' has become more verbose, printing this in every test:
On 08.01.2019 19:58, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 08.01.2019 19:45, stevek...@apache.org wrote:
Author: steveking
Date: Tue Jan 8 18:45:45 2019
New Revision: 1850781
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1850781&view=rev
Log:
Extend the blame callback with a string length parameter.
* subversion
> On 08.01.2019 19:45, stevek...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: steveking
>> Date: Tue Jan 8 18:45:45 2019
>> New Revision: 1850781
[...]
>> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h?rev=1850
On 08.01.2019 20:30, Michael Pilato wrote:
On 08.01.2019 19:45, stevek...@apache.org wrote:
Author: steveking
Date: Tue Jan 8 18:45:45 2019
New Revision: 1850781
[...]
Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversio
Summary:
+1 to release (Unix)
Verified:
- Tarball contents and signatures
- check ((fsfs, bdb) × (local, svnserve, dav))
- check-all-javahl
- check-swig-py
- check-swig-rb
- check-swig-pl
Known issues:
- 'make check-swig-py' requires 'make install install-swig-py'.
- 'make
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 1:45 PM Julian Foad wrote:
>
> The 1.11.1 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> - Julian
Summary
---
+1 to relea
On 08.01.2019 20:19, Branko Čibej wrote:
> New issues:
>
> - 'make check-javahl' has become more verbose, printing this in every test:
>
> WARNING in native method: JNI call made without checking
> exceptions when required to from CallObjectMethodV
Most of these seem to have been
Summary:
+1 to release (Unix)
Verified:
- Tarball contents and signatures
- check ((fsfs, bdb) × (local, svnserve, dav))
- check-all-javahl
- check-swig-py
- check-swig-rb
- check-swig-pl
Known issues:
- 'make check-swig-py' requires 'make install install-swig-py'.
- 'make
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 1:46 PM Julian Foad wrote:
>
> The 1.10.4 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> - Julian
Summary
---
+1 to relea
On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 1:46 PM Julian Foad wrote:
>
> The 1.9.10 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> - Julian
Summary
---
+1 to relea
18 matches
Mail list logo
