On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 09:18:21AM +0000, Julian Foad wrote: > Branko Čibej wrote: > > Why this (and the 1.8.x) nomination? > > It's useful information, to a few people. In this case, Stefan can answer for > himself, but I guess he had done most of the work anyway and might as well > record the result of it. In general, if somebody wants to do the work > nominating and/or testing, and if it doesn't distract much energy from the > rest of us, that's fine. This wasn't a significant distraction to me; I don't > intend to review it or do anything with it.
Yes, I just added it there because the overhead to do so was minimal for me. But I didn't mean to ask anyone to invest time in unsupported releases. I mainly wanted to see how far back the patch would merge cleanly to get some idea how old this bug really is :)
