Hi,
It seems that we introduced a bug in the interactive conflict resolver
in 1.8 (and later) that is a regression vs. 1.7. It segfaults on a NULL
pointer for conflicts in binary files.
>From what I could find out is that for binary files, the conflict resolver
description doesn't actually set th
Hi,
There is yet another problem with sub-tree mergeinfo:
(1) User A performs a sub-tree merge causing the mi property
to be added to the sub-node. No commit, yet.
(2) User B commits a merge at the branch root, modifying its m/i.
(3) User A updates and commits their merge.
Now, the sub-tree me
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann <
stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is yet another problem with sub-tree mergeinfo:
>
> (1) User A performs a sub-tree merge causing the mi property
> to be added to the sub-node. No commit, yet.
> (2) User B commits a merge at
On 9 December 2014 at 12:16, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.7.19 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on December 15th so
> please try and
On 9 December 2014 at 12:30, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.8.11 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. I plan to try and release on December 15th so
> please try and
On 02/12/14 16:49, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 11/28/2014 12:03 PM, Hannes Reich wrote:
I'd like to suggest an extension to the authz file format to support the
following scenario:
* Some users of the repository should have access to everything, others
should be restricted to a small set of
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> Looking through ^/subversion/branches, I found that there are many
> backport branches that are not mentioned in any STATUS file.
[...]
> 1.7.x
> Julian: 1.7.x-r1594156 (not modified)
I found that a branch incorrectly named '1.7.x-r1594157' was used instead for
backporti
On 11.12.2014 14:37, Hannes Reich wrote:
> Thanks for the encouragement and background information.
>
> I've attached the patch, which I would describe as a workaround for
> the underlying issue the authz-overhaul branch is addressing.
>
> Since the patch lacks authz-overhaul's concept of "list acc
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Reser [mailto:b...@reser.org]
> Sent: dinsdag 9 december 2014 10:17
> To: Subversion Development
> Subject: 1.7.19 up for testing/signing
>
> The 1.7.19 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://di
9 matches
Mail list logo
