On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann <
stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> There is yet another problem with sub-tree mergeinfo:
>
> (1) User A performs a sub-tree merge causing the mi property
>   to be added to the sub-node. No commit, yet.
> (2) User B commits a merge at the branch root, modifying its m/i.
> (3) User A updates and commits their merge.
>
> Now, the sub-tree mergeinfo does not reflect the changes
> made to the root node m/i. If the latter are operative on that
> sub-tree, the data is inconsistent and can create conflicts.
>
> The attached script demonstrates the problem.
>
> -- Stefan^2.
>

... and there is the script.

Attachment: mergeinfo-inconsistency.sh
Description: Bourne shell script

Reply via email to