Gabriela Gibson wrote on Sun, Dec 30, 2012 at 22:31:36 +:
> But this would leave space for other projects. Does anyone have ideas
> for good (relatively small) projects to help me learn the code base?
Perhaps pick a library and grep for "###|TODO|FIXME"? Investigating any
one of them (and re
> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
> Sent: maandag 31 december 2012 08:55
> To: Johan Corveleyn
> Cc: Ben Reser; Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: 1.6.20 up for testing/signing
>
> Johan Corveleyn wrote on Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 01:50:19 +0100:
Hello,
I'm playing around with LLVM sources and would like to make local tweaks
while keeping track with ongoing development in the trunk. I tried
issuing the command:
svn copy http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk
svn+ssh://usern...@myserver.net/usr/data/llvm-local
to which SV
On 31.12.2012 12:36, Ziemowit Laski wrote:
> My question is this: Is there a compelling technical reason why
> branching must occur within the same repository? I'm tempted to try my
> hand in adding cross-repository branching to SVN, but would like to make
> sure first that this is not impossible.
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 03:36:16AM -0800, Ziemowit Laski wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I'm playing around with LLVM sources and would like to make local tweaks
> while keeping track with ongoing development in the trunk. I tried
> issuing the command:
>
>
>
> svn copy http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-
On 31.12.2012 15:05, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Anything more involved than the foreign-repos merge crutch above would be
> far from trivial. And there is no point in making Subversion a distributed
> version control system.
I think you're misinterpreting what "foreign repository branch" means.
It d
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 03:18:41PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 31.12.2012 15:05, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > Anything more involved than the foreign-repos merge crutch above would be
> > far from trivial. And there is no point in making Subversion a distributed
> > version control system.
>
> I
On 31.12.2012 15:38, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 03:18:41PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> Rather, it would do away with all the hoops you have to jump through in
>> order to work with vendor branches. It would also remove 99% of the use
>> cases for out-of-repo externals.
>>
>>
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 07:22:20PM +1000, Miriam Hochwald wrote:
> As yet I am still setting up the development environment, working through
> the follow instructions:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/INSTALL
>
> Putting together all these bits and bods seems quite foreign to
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> I think the necessary patches are in
> ^/subversion/branches/subversion/branches/1.6.x-serf-1-win32
I think the reason 1.6.x doesn't have serf-1 fixes is because we've
been trying to limit 1.6.x to security and stability fixes. Serf is
an op
Hi.
I found a bug in token_compare() defined in
subversion/libsvn_diff/diff_file.c.
When reading token from file, offset of the normalized token
and the length before normalization are used.
This causes reading exceeding the file size or comparison beyond the
end-of-line.
The attached patch fix
This is a first cut, there is room for improvement, please let me know
what you think.
Because of the size of the changes, I considered attaching the resulting
web page -- would that be appropriate in future?
Happy New Year!
Gabriela
[[[
Addition of section describing procedure for obtaining
Hi Stefan,
Thank you for the quick response.
> Subversion hasn't been designed for distributed operation.
> See
>
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_
> base/notes/fs-history
> and
>
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_
> fs/st
Ziemowit Laski wrote on Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 15:01:50 -0800:
> > Subversion hasn't been designed for distributed operation.
> > See
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_
> > base/notes/fs-history
> > and
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> (This is currently not possible because svnsync assumes that it writes
> to the repository root and assumes revnums in the src and dest
> repositories must equal; with the change, what will have to be equal is
> some sort of svn:sync-source-r
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> You should be engaging with the llvm community
> and get commit access, rather than maintaining an isolated fork.
I'll point out the irony here and I offer my apologies to Stefan if
you feel that this is targeting you. While I'm replying
16 matches
Mail list logo
