> -Original Message-
> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:danie...@elego.de]
> Sent: donderdag 4 oktober 2012 00:12
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Cc: comm...@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svn-role reintegrates Re: svn commit: r1392727 - in
> /subversion/branches/1.7.x: ./ STATUS subversio
On 10/03/2012 03:39 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:51 AM, wrote:
>> Author: cmpilato
>> Date: Wed Oct 3 14:51:36 2012
>> New Revision: 1393521
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1393521&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Use "svn:txn:" as the namespace for ephemeral txnprops, not
Building on Windows vc2005 i had problem with svn_private_config.h not
being found in the .zip its named: svn_private_config.hw not sure if
this is a bug of mean to be some kind of *.h.in file for autoconf or
something. But thought it was worth noting.
--Phil
On 04/10/12 07:25, Ben Reser wrot
Did you run the Python script (gen-make.py) to generate the Windows
build files? That is a first step required in doing a Windows build
and that is what generates that file from the template. The
equivalent of running ./configure on *nix.
Mark
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Philip Herron
Maybe gen-mak.py didn't run properly i will re-check. Its just a really
buggy batch file i have so might be my fault sorry. Will recheck. Though
then again if gen-mak.py didnt run i wouldnt have had the *.sln to run
msbuild over.
--Phil
On 04/10/12 15:14, Mark Phippard wrote:
Did you run the
I paid closer attention this time. The file is *not* generated when I
run the Python script. When I build the solution from the command
line the file is generated, so it must be done as part of the Visual
Studio build scripts.
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Philip Herron
wrote:
> Maybe gen-
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 5:54 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 10/03/2012 03:39 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 10:51 AM, wrote:
>>> Author: cmpilato
>>> Date: Wed Oct 3 14:51:36 2012
>>> New Revision: 1393521
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1393521&view=rev
>>>
I believe it should just do a simple "copy svn_private_config.hw
svn_private_config.h"
I have it knobbled in my build script to do the copy before invoking
the solution build because I never figured out why the solution didn't
copy it.
On 4 October 2012 16:00, Mark Phippard wrote:
> I paid clos
On 10/04/2012 11:01 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> I recall trying to do that and it wouldn't work. I do believe
> namespaces is how we resolved it for svn:foo style properties. If
> we're going to be doing svn:foo:bar style properties then we can
> probably resolve it for svn:foo properties that way by
On 04.10.2012 17:19, Mat Booth wrote:
> I believe it should just do a simple "copy svn_private_config.hw
> svn_private_config.h"
That might work in 1.7 but won't in 1.8, which uses a transform script
on Windows to fill in some variables that are really only known at build
time (e.g., architecture
On 04.10.2012 17:19, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 10/04/2012 11:01 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
>> I recall trying to do that and it wouldn't work. I do believe
>> namespaces is how we resolved it for svn:foo style properties. If
>> we're going to be doing svn:foo:bar style properties then we can
>> pro
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.7.7 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. Thanks!
SUMMARY:
+1 to release
PLATFORM:
Windows 7
VS 200
On 10/04/2012 02:25 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.7.7 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. Thanks!
Summary:
+1 to release.
Platform:
Ubuntu 12.04.1 (pre
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.7.7 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. Thanks!
If possible I'd like to wait for serf 1.1.1 to test t
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The 1.7.7 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
> Please get the tarballs from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
> and add your signatures there. Thanks!
SUMMARY:
-
+1 to release
VERIFIED:
-
Johan,
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
>> The 1.7.7 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
>> Please get the tarballs from
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
>> and add your signatures
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Lieven Govaerts"
Date: Oct 4, 2012 5:11 PM
Subject: [serf-dev] Serf release 1.1.1
To:
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce the serf 1.1.1 release!
This patch release contains fixes for some important connection
stability issues. From CHANGES:
Fi
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
>> The 1.7.7 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
>> Please get the tarballs from
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/subversion
>> and add your signatures there.
On 10/04/2012 07:57 PM, bre...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: breser
> Date: Thu Oct 4 23:57:26 2012
> New Revision: 1394332
[...]
> Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h?rev=1394332&r1=1394
On 10/04/2012 09:46 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Perhaps you meant something like:
>
> "... it will enter versioned directories, scheduling any unversioned
> children thereof for addition."
Sorry -- I just saw that you fixed the *unversioned* bit. My additional
questions remain:
> But why onl
On 10/04/2012 09:55 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Fri Oct 5 01:54:59 2012
> New Revision: 1394346
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1394346&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_ra_svn/client.c
> (ra_svn_commit): initialize *all* members of the ccb struct
>
>
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 6:48 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 10/04/2012 09:46 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> Perhaps you meant something like:
>>
>> "... it will enter versioned directories, scheduling any unversioned
>> children thereof for addition."
>
> Sorry -- I just saw that you fixed the
22 matches
Mail list logo