On 10/04/2012 07:57 PM, bre...@apache.org wrote: > Author: breser > Date: Thu Oct 4 23:57:26 2012 > New Revision: 1394332
[...] > Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h?rev=1394332&r1=1394331&r2=1394332&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h (original) > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/include/svn_client.h Thu Oct 4 23:57:26 2012 > @@ -1469,10 +1469,9 @@ svn_client_switch(svn_revnum_t *result_r > * > * If @a force is not set and @a path is already under version > * control, return the error #SVN_ERR_ENTRY_EXISTS. If @a force is > - * set, do not error on already-versioned items. When used on a > - * directory in conjunction with the @a recursive flag, this has the > - * effect of scheduling for addition unversioned files and directories > - * scattered deep within a versioned tree. > + * set, do not error on already-versioned items. When used with @a depth > + * set to #svn_depth_infinity it will enter versioned directories; scheduling > + * versioned children. "scheduling versioned children" doesn't really parse for me in this context semantically. Also, the semicolon that precedes the phrase is not the proper punctuation for offsetting such a thing. Perhaps you meant something like: "... it will enter versioned directories, scheduling any unversioned children thereof for addition." But why only #svn_depth_infinity? Will it not do the same (to different depths, of course) for #svn_depth_files and #svn_depth_immediates? -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
