Did this just break getopt_tests.py 2?
On 09/10/2012 07:37 AM, br...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: brane
> Date: Mon Sep 10 11:37:33 2012
> New Revision: 1382764
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1382764&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_subr/opt.c (svn_opt__get_version_info):
> Refor
It might have. I'm still running the tests.
-- Brane
On 10.09.2012 13:56, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Did this just break getopt_tests.py 2?
>
> On 09/10/2012 07:37 AM, br...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: brane
>> Date: Mon Sep 10 11:37:33 2012
>> New Revision: 1382764
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.
(Answering my own question...) Yes, it did. I fixed the test expectations
for you:
Sendinggetopt_tests_data/svn--version_stdout
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 1382782.
On 09/10/2012 07:56 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Did this just break getopt_tests.py 2?
>
> On
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:24:37AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> As discussed in a different thread, I'd like to run the release
> process for 1.6.19.
>
> There are a handful of nominations in 1.6.x STATUS and it would be
> nice to get as many as possible included in the next (possibly final?)
>
On 10.09.2012 14:04, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> (Answering my own question...) Yes, it did. I fixed the test expectations
> for you:
>
>Sendinggetopt_tests_data/svn--version_stdout
>Transmitting file data .
>Committed revision 1382782.
Thanks! I made the same change locally, b
On 09/10/2012 08:26 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:24:37AM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> As discussed in a different thread, I'd like to run the release
>> process for 1.6.19.
>>
>> There are a handful of nominations in 1.6.x STATUS and it would be
>> nice to get as many
cmpil...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:52:32 -:
> Author: cmpilato
> Date: Mon Sep 10 12:52:32 2012
> New Revision: 1382806
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1382806&view=rev
> Log:
> On the '1.6.x' branch:
>
> * STATUS
> (r1338810 group): Add r1339154, resolving danie
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:56:11AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Sorry, Stefan. I'd intended to cruise through the backport suggestions last
> week, but got my attention stuck on other tasks. I've just added the
> necessary votes to backport three more changes. All that remains are
> proposa
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 03:29:47PM +0200, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> I believe we're in good shape now for rolling the release :)
One issue is that the 1.6.x test suite won't run properly
with APR-1.4.6 :(
I'm willing to wade through related commits backported to 1.7.x
and create a cor
On Sep 10, 2012 10:19 AM, wrote:
>
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Mon Sep 10 14:18:51 2012
> New Revision: 1382864
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1382864&view=rev
> Log:
> [in tools/server-side/svnpubsub]
>
> Fix a bogus logging.critical().
>
> Found by: joes
>
> * svnwcsub.py
> (Backgrou
Stefan Sperling writes:
> One issue is that the 1.6.x test suite won't run properly
> with APR-1.4.6 :(
>
> I'm willing to wade through related commits backported to 1.7.x
> and create a corresponding 1.6.x backport branch.
> This is a one-time effort, after all.
I guess you are referring to the
stef...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 00:14:28 -:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Fri Sep 7 00:14:28 2012
> New Revision: 1381814
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1381814&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix a performance issue created by directory deltification: rep streams
> don't support ma
stef...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 00:22:46 -:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Fri Sep 7 00:22:45 2012
> New Revision: 1381817
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1381817&view=rev
> Log:
> Follow-up to r1381814.
>
> * subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/fs_fs.c
> (get_dir_contents): expa
stef...@apache.org wrote on Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 13:51:39 -:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Sat Sep 8 13:51:39 2012
> New Revision: 1382304
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1382304&view=rev
> Log:
> Fix a minor issue with props deltification: Deltify against a props
> representation inste
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:19 PM, wrote:
> Author: brane
> Date: Mon Sep 10 17:19:31 2012
> New Revision: 1382990
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1382990&view=rev
> Log:
> Make the extended version info retrieval a public API.
>
[...]
> + *
> + * @since New in 1.8.
> + */
> +typedef stru
On 10.09.2012 21:52, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:19 PM, wrote:
>> Author: brane
>> Date: Mon Sep 10 17:19:31 2012
>> New Revision: 1382990
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1382990&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Make the extended version info retrieval a public API.
>>
> [...]
>
Brane wrote:
[...]
> +#if LINUX
> +static const char *linux_release_name(apr_pool_t *pool);
> +#endif
[...]
On my Ubuntu GNU/Linux system:
subversion/libsvn_subr/sysinfo.c:92:5: "LINUX" is not defined
subversion/libsvn_subr/sysinfo.c:116:7: "LINUX" is not defined
subversion/libsvn_subr/sysinfo.c
On 10.09.2012 22:33, Julian Foad wrote:
> Brane wrote:
> [...]
>
>> +#if LINUX
>> +static const char *linux_release_name(apr_pool_t *pool);
>> +#endif
> [...]
>
> On my Ubuntu GNU/Linux system:
>
> subversion/libsvn_subr/sysinfo.c:92:5: "LINUX" is not defined
> subversion/libsvn_subr/sysinfo.c:116:
> -Original Message-
> From: Branko Čibej [mailto:br...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: maandag 10 september 2012 22:48
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1381257 - sysinfo.c -
>
> On 10.09.2012 22:33, Julian Foad wrote:
> > Brane wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> >> +#if LINUX
> >>
> On 10.09.2012 22:33, Julian Foad wrote:
>> Brane wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> +#if LINUX
>>> +static const char *linux_release_name(apr_pool_t *pool);
>>> +#endif
>> [...]
>>
>> On my Ubuntu GNU/Linux system:
>>
>> subversion/libsvn_subr/sysinfo.c:92:5: "LINUX" is not defined
>> subversion
Julian Foad wrote on Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 22:16:26 +0100:
> > On 10.09.2012 22:33, Julian Foad wrote:
>
> >> Brane wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >>> +#if LINUX
> >>> +static const char *linux_release_name(apr_pool_t *pool);
> >>> +#endif
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> On my Ubuntu GNU/Linux system:
> >>
br...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 17:19:32 -:
> Author: brane
> Date: Mon Sep 10 17:19:31 2012
> New Revision: 1382990
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1382990&view=rev
> Log:
> Make the extended version info retrieval a public API.
>
> +/**
> + * Extended version infoma
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> What about __LINUX__ ?
$ echo | gcc -dM -E - | grep -i linux
#define __linux 1
#define __linux__ 1
#define __gnu_linux__ 1
#define linux 1
--
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
On 10.09.2012 23:01, Bert Huijben wrote:
> I assume you already noticed, but all the buildbots are red after your
> latest version info output tweaks.
Eh. Bug in the test that didn't show up on my box. Fixed in r1383123, I
think.
-- Brane
--
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
h
On 10.09.2012 23:16, Julian Foad wrote:
>> On 10.09.2012 22:33, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> Brane wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
+#if LINUX
+static const char *linux_release_name(apr_pool_t *pool);
+#endif
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> On my Ubuntu GNU/Linux system:
>>>
>>> subversion/libsvn_subr/sysin
On 10.09.2012 23:49, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> br...@apache.org wrote on Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 17:19:32 -:
>> Author: brane
>> Date: Mon Sep 10 17:19:31 2012
>> New Revision: 1382990
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1382990&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Make the extended version info retrieval a p
Branko Čibej wrote on Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 00:12:11 +0200:
> On 10.09.2012 23:49, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >> + /**
> >> + * Array of svn_version_loaded_lib_t describing loaded shared libraries.
> >> + */
> >> + const apr_array_header_t *loaded_libs;
> > Please document the type ('const char *'
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> stef...@apache.org wrote on Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 13:51:39 -:
> > Author: stefan2
> > Date: Sat Sep 8 13:51:39 2012
> > New Revision: 1382304
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1382304&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Fix a minor issue w
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> stef...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 00:22:46 -:
> > Author: stefan2
> > Date: Fri Sep 7 00:22:45 2012
> > New Revision: 1381817
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1381817&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Follow-up to r13818
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 01:32:54 +0200:
> > On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >
> > > I think this fix is wrong. svn_fs_fs__read_noderev() should return the
> > > parsed noderev as is --- if it's a
Hi all,
Some of you may remember the ideas that I put
down in writing 1.5 years ago:
^/notes/fsfs-improvements.txt
Over the last two weeks, I got a very rough
first prototype running and I will commit it after
sending this post. Testing the results pointed
me to the FSFS performance issues that
On 9/10/12 6:42 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Tue Sep 11 01:42:01 2012
New Revision: 1383214
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1383214&view=rev
Log:
Add a very early prototype of an FSFS pack optimization tool.
* tools/fsfs
(new folder)
Suggest one of two things w
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 10.09.2012 21:52, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 9:19 PM, wrote:
>>> Author: brane
>>> Date: Mon Sep 10 17:19:31 2012
>>> New Revision: 1382990
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1382990&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Ma
33 matches
Mail list logo
