Barry Scott writes:
> On 10 Jan 2011, at 03:59, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>
>> Are the typedefs for SVN_FILESIZE_T_FMT and APR_OFF_T_FMT correct?
>
> No APR_OFF_T_FMT is wrong. Its "%lld" but needs to be APR_INT64_T_FMT so
> that the apr_xxxprintf code will process it. It turns out that %lld is only
On Sat, 2011-02-26, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 26.02.2011 20:40, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> > Btw I think it makes sense rename file to tmp directory in working
> > copy instead of pristines directory, since it could be crash/failure
> > between rename and delete. In this case pristines directory will
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: 25 February 2011 15:33
> To: Noorul Islam K M
> Cc: Subversion
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for issue 3799 - exporting file should not overwrite
>
> On Sat, 2011-02-19, Noorul Islam K M wrote:
> > I think it
On 02/27/2011 03:39 AM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> function to determine whether a path is part of a working copy.
> Currently I'm misusing svn_wc_check_wc2() for this, but I'd rather have a
> proper and fast svn_client_is_workingcopy(const char* path) function for this.
I've often wondered about this m
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> > Hello folks: I'd like to cut 1.6.16 next Wednesday. Please nominate /
> > review / vote / etc in the mean time.
>
> Hopefully this isn't dashing too many hopes, but I'm running out of
> tuits this week, and it appears folks still have
On Mon, 2011-02-28, I (Julian Foad) wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-02-26, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > On 26.02.2011 20:40, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> > > Btw I think it makes sense rename file to tmp directory in working
> > > copy instead of pristines directory, since it could be crash/failure
> > > between rename a
Bogus path handling bug:
[[[
% svnadmin create r1
% svnadmin create r2
% svn co -q file://`pwd`/r1 wc1
% svn co -q file://`pwd`/r2 wc2
% ls -d *[12]
r1 r2 wc1 wc2
% touch wc2/iota
% $svn add -q wc2/iota
% cd wc1
% pwd
/tmp/svn/wc1
% $svn di /tmp/svn/wc2/
subversion/svn/diff-cmd.c:367: (apr_er
> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Foad [mailto:julian.f...@wandisco.com]
> Sent: maandag 28 februari 2011 19:29
> To: Branko Čibej
> Cc: Subversion Development
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1073366 - in /subversion/trunk: notes/wc-
> ng/pristine-store subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-queries.sql
>
On 02/28/2011 01:46 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
Barry Scott writes:
On 10 Jan 2011, at 03:59, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Are the typedefs for SVN_FILESIZE_T_FMT and APR_OFF_T_FMT correct?
No APR_OFF_T_FMT is wrong. Its "%lld" but needs to be APR_INT64_T_FMT so
that the apr_xxxprintf code will proce
On 28.02.2011 15:22, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
On 02/27/2011 03:39 AM, Stefan Küng wrote:
function to determine whether a path is part of a working copy.
Currently I'm misusing svn_wc_check_wc2() for this, but I'd rather have a
proper and fast svn_client_is_workingcopy(const char* path) function
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 06:40, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 02:34:44AM -0500, Greg Stein wrote:
>> Hyrum,
>>
>> On IRC, we also talked about trying to remove stat() calls from the
>> parse function. Upon reflection, that won't be possible. If the given
>> path is below a wcroot
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 15:16, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 08:52:18PM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> I think just seeing every node below a workingcopy as a node in the parent
>> working copy will make things harder instead of simpler. So I would suggest
>> moving the redefinin
On 23 February 2011 08:43, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> You may have noticed that I prepared yet another bunch
> of changes for integration into /trunk (details below).
> All other remaining changes on the performance branch
> are 1.8 material.
>
> You know the drill: The integration bra
Translation status report for trunk@r1075650
lang trans untrans fuzzy obs
--
de2048 132 252 216
es1985 195 283 354
fr2170 10 22 22
it1838 342 477 174
ja1976
Hi,
I tried to compile subversion trunk with httpd trunk code. make fails
with the attached error.
Then I got that there is a macro APLOG_MARK which expands differently in
httpd-2.2.x and httpd-2.3-dev.
From httpd-2.2.x,
#define APLOG_MARK __FILE__,__LINE__
From httpd-2.3-dev,
#define AP
15 matches
Mail list logo