> Mark Phippard :
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Karl Fogel wrote:
>> So maybe a way to approach this is to ask:
>>
>> For those for whom Subversion is currently the best solution, what
>> *else* do they need it to do?
> From users I have heard from the two main themes would be:
> 1) Pe
On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 14:13 -0500, Steinar Bang wrote:
> And then later, when I'm online, I do a an update against the
> repository, with virgin versions of the changed files, and then I copy
> in the copied-aside files, and do my checkins in stages.
FWIW, a lot of people seem to use git as a Subv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Log:
Fix issue #3544 -- svn update does not restore excluded files.
* subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c
(complete_directory): Call `svn_wc__set_depth()' with the requested
depth and with `infinity' only when the depth value is `unknown'.
* su
Nothing. We should start a graduation vote this week.
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 15:17, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> It's been a few weeks, since we've talked about it, and as our report to the
> Incubator PMC is due sometime soon, I'd like to ask: what do we have left for
> graduation? I'm not trying
4 matches
Mail list logo
