>>>>> Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com>: > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Karl Fogel <kfo...@red-bean.com> wrote: >> So maybe a way to approach this is to ask: >> >> For those for whom Subversion is currently the best solution, what >> *else* do they need it to do?
> From users I have heard from the two main themes would be: > 1) Performance > 2) Handling of move/renames 3) Improved offline client functionality. I like to check in my changes in such a way that the diffs show a logical progress. The way I do it offline in CVS and SVN, is that I copy aside versions of the file, for each planned. And then later, when I'm online, I do a an update against the repository, with virgin versions of the changed files, and then I copy in the copied-aside files, and do my checkins in stages. Some way to automate that workflow would be nice. I guess this could be accomplished in a tool run separately from svn, but then I lose SVN tool support.
