Stefan Sperling wrote on Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 22:53:13 +0200:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:43:38PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> > Is there a way that this can be tested? ie. avoid similar situations
> > in the future?
>
> I don't know. I came across this because I saw code that did:
>
> peg_rev =
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:43:38PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> Is there a way that this can be tested? ie. avoid similar situations
> in the future?
I don't know. I came across this because I saw code that did:
peg_rev = INVALID_REVNUM;
/* do nothing with peg_rev */
if (peg_rev == INVALIV_REVNU
Is there a way that this can be tested? ie. avoid similar situations
in the future?
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:50, wrote:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Wed Jun 22 15:50:54 2011
> New Revision: 1138516
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1138516&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_client/ra.c
>
3 matches
Mail list logo
