Is there a way that this can be tested? ie. avoid similar situations in the future?
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:50, <s...@apache.org> wrote: > Author: stsp > Date: Wed Jun 22 15:50:54 2011 > New Revision: 1138516 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1138516&view=rev > Log: > * subversion/libsvn_client/ra.c > (svn_client__repos_locations): PEG_REVNUM used to be initialised from > copyfrom info (if any) before r1092150. Since this revision we've > accidentally left PEG_REVNUM initialised to SVN_INVALID_REVNUM all > the time (Bert confirmed that this change was accidental). > This didn't cause any test failures, and neither does this change. > But we're now back to the original semantics. >...
