On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 18:36, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> This may be picking nits, but is the format for size_t and apr_size_t
> guaranteed to be the same on all platforms?
size_t might not exist on some (ancient) platforms. That is the entire
purpose behind apr_size_t.
But... if size_t exists, th
On 21.05.2011 00:36, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> This may be picking nits, but is the format for size_t and apr_size_t
> guaranteed to be the same on all platforms?
I expect it is. But even if it isn't it's certainly better than %d,
because sizeof(int) and sizeof(size_t) are certainly not guaranteed t
This may be picking nits, but is the format for size_t and apr_size_t
guaranteed to be the same on all platforms?
-Hyrum
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 4:17 AM, wrote:
> Author: philip
> Date: Fri May 20 11:17:58 2011
> New Revision: 1125327
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1125327&view=rev
>
3 matches
Mail list logo
