On 21.05.2011 00:36, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> This may be picking nits, but is the format for size_t and apr_size_t
> guaranteed to be the same on all platforms?

I expect it is. But even if it isn't it's certainly better than %d,
because sizeof(int) and sizeof(size_t) are certainly not guaranteed to
be the same.

-- Brane

Reply via email to