Re: svn commit: r1058308 - /subversion/site/publish/docs/release-notes/1.7.html

2011-01-13 Thread Philip Martin
Daniel Shahaf writes: > Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:56:09 +: >> Stefan Sperling writes: >> > The scenario we're talking about is where people run a 1.7 server >> > and use a 1.6 or earlier svnsync binary. >> > >> > I suppose in this case your hook script would help? >> >>

Re: svn commit: r1058308 - /subversion/site/publish/docs/release-notes/1.7.html

2011-01-13 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:56:09 +: > Stefan Sperling writes: > > The scenario we're talking about is where people run a 1.7 server > > and use a 1.6 or earlier svnsync binary. > > > > I suppose in this case your hook script would help? > > No, I don't think it does. Dani

Re: svn commit: r1058308 - /subversion/site/publish/docs/release-notes/1.7.html

2011-01-13 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:56:09AM +, Philip Martin wrote: > Stefan Sperling writes: > > The scenario we're talking about is where people run a 1.7 server > > and use a 1.6 or earlier svnsync binary. > > > > I suppose in this case your hook script would help? > > No, I don't think it does. D

Re: svn commit: r1058308 - /subversion/site/publish/docs/release-notes/1.7.html

2011-01-13 Thread Philip Martin
Stefan Sperling writes: > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 09:31:36AM +, Philip Martin wrote: >> Daniel Shahaf writes: >> >> > * The difference that's supposed to cause Philip's script to work as >> > advertised is that svn_repos_fs_change_rev_prop4() uses the same >> > propvalue to compute the

Re: svn commit: r1058308 - /subversion/site/publish/docs/release-notes/1.7.html

2011-01-13 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 09:31:36AM +, Philip Martin wrote: > Daniel Shahaf writes: > > > * The difference that's supposed to cause Philip's script to work as > > advertised is that svn_repos_fs_change_rev_prop4() uses the same > > propvalue to compute the ACTION parameter and to pass as t

Re: svn commit: r1058308 - /subversion/site/publish/docs/release-notes/1.7.html

2011-01-13 Thread Philip Martin
Daniel Shahaf writes: > * The difference that's supposed to cause Philip's script to work as > advertised is that svn_repos_fs_change_rev_prop4() uses the same > propvalue to compute the ACTION parameter and to pass as the "old > propvalue" to the FS for atomicity. > > I'm too sleepy righ

Re: svn commit: r1058308 - /subversion/site/publish/docs/release-notes/1.7.html

2011-01-12 Thread Daniel Shahaf
s...@apache.org wrote on Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 20:36:34 -: > Author: stsp > Date: Wed Jan 12 20:36:33 2011 > New Revision: 1058308 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1058308&view=rev > Log: > * publish/docs/release-notes/1.7.html > (atomic-revprops): Mention that this is also a client-