On Mon, 2010-12-06, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 12/6/10 7:47 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-12-05, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> >> I've felt kind of uneasy about that issue as well.
> >> However, it would have been difficult to implement
> >> a deprecated svn_checksum_to_cstring() in terms
> >> o
On 12/6/10 7:47 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
On Sun, 2010-12-05, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
I've felt kind of uneasy about that issue as well.
However, it would have been difficult to implement
a deprecated svn_checksum_to_cstring() in terms
of svn_checksum_to_cstring2().
I don't think Blair was concern
On Sun, 2010-12-05, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On 02.12.2010 07:57, Blair Zajac wrote:
> > On 12/1/10 4:38 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
> >> Author: stefan2
> >> Date: Thu Dec 2 00:38:17 2010
> >> New Revision: 1041230
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1041230&view=rev
> >> Log:
> >>
On 02.12.2010 07:57, Blair Zajac wrote:
On 12/1/10 4:38 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Thu Dec 2 00:38:17 2010
New Revision: 1041230
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1041230&view=rev
Log:
Fix the svn_checksum_to_cstring() docstring to actually say what
was intended. A
On Wed, 2010-12-01, Blair Zajac wrote:
> On 12/1/10 4:38 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: stefan2
> > Date: Thu Dec 2 00:38:17 2010
> > New Revision: 1041230
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1041230&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Fix the svn_checksum_to_cstring() docstring to actually
On 12/1/10 4:38 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Thu Dec 2 00:38:17 2010
New Revision: 1041230
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1041230&view=rev
Log:
Fix the svn_checksum_to_cstring() docstring to actually say what
was intended. Also, make clear that the behavior is new
6 matches
Mail list logo
