On 12/6/10 7:47 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
On Sun, 2010-12-05, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
I've felt kind of uneasy about that issue as well.
However, it would have been difficult to implement
a deprecated svn_checksum_to_cstring() in terms
of svn_checksum_to_cstring2().
I don't think Blair was concerned about how the function is implemented,
but about the API promises. (He can correct me if I'm wrong.)
Nope, that's correct.
But, as I said in my previous reply in this thread, I think it's fine to
just change the existing API as you have done.
Well, I don't agree, for problems that it could cause later, but don't feel that
strongly to argue about it :)
Blair
