Re: Trunk buildbot broken

2023-08-31 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den ons 30 aug. 2023 kl 01:34 skrev Nathan Hartman : > On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 6:05 AM Daniel Sahlberg > wrote: > ... > > I don't really see the point of a nightly tarball, for bleeding > edge/developers it is probably as easy to run from a /trunk checkout. > > > > I'm proposing to completely el

Re: Trunk buildbot broken

2023-08-29 Thread Nathan Hartman
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 6:05 AM Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > On 2022/06/30 14:04:08 Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > > Den tors 30 juni 2022 kl 15:45 skrev Nathan Hartman < > > hartman.nat...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Recent breakage in the PO files wasn't detected by the buildbot so I > > > went digging. > > >

Re: Trunk buildbot broken

2023-08-29 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
On 2022/06/30 14:04:08 Daniel Sahlberg wrote: > Den tors 30 juni 2022 kl 15:45 skrev Nathan Hartman < > hartman.nat...@gmail.com>: > > > Recent breakage in the PO files wasn't detected by the buildbot so I > > went digging. > > > > The buildbot infrastructure changed recently. Builders are now lis

Re: Trunk buildbot broken

2022-07-08 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den tors 30 juni 2022 kl 15:45 skrev Nathan Hartman < hartman.nat...@gmail.com>: > Recent breakage in the PO files wasn't detected by the buildbot so I > went digging. > > The buildbot infrastructure changed recently. Builders are now listed at > [1]. > > [...] > [1] all builders: https://ci2.ap

Re: Trunk buildbot broken

2022-06-30 Thread Daniel Sahlberg
Den tors 30 juni 2022 kl 15:45 skrev Nathan Hartman < hartman.nat...@gmail.com>: > Recent breakage in the PO files wasn't detected by the buildbot so I > went digging. > > The buildbot infrastructure changed recently. Builders are now listed at > [1]. > > At this time, svn-backport-conflicts-1.10.