Den ons 30 aug. 2023 kl 01:34 skrev Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com >:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 6:05 AM Daniel Sahlberg <dsahlb...@apache.org> > wrote: > ... > > I don't really see the point of a nightly tarball, for bleeding > edge/developers it is probably as easy to run from a /trunk checkout. > > > > I'm proposing to completely eliminate the svn-trunk-nightly buildbot > job. (Will do this later this week unless someone objects). > > > > Kind regards, > > Daniel Sahlberg > > > > [1] > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/tools/dist/release.py > > [2] > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/tools/dist/backport/ > > [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/1mkzl84fdx6jp8kgqq74cm2v56xntbs8 > > > I'm +1 to remove the nightly tarball job for multiple reasons. Anyway, > no one complained that they're already missing, and have been for some > time. > Started ripping out the nightlies. Committed r1084067 in the infrastructure repo to remove the buildbot job. It looks like the work is done in tools/dist/nightly.sh, with > additional logic in tools/dist/dist.sh and tools/dist/release.py to > special-case the nightlies. > Didn't dare to touch this code. nightly.sh seems quite safe to remove, don't know if we would want to keep the special-casing of "nightly" in release.py and dist.py for the future or for backwards compatibility. Also, the section #nightlies in site/publish/source-code.html contains > a link to https://ci.apache.org/projects/subversion/nightlies/index.html, > which is 404 since the CI migrated. > Good find. Removed in r1912028 (in staging, feel free to review and merge). > I was interrupted in the middle and wasn't able to search exhaustively > for all nightly-tarball-related stuff, but let me know if you need > help... > Please feel free... I'm also out of time right now. Kind regards, /Daniel
