Julian Foad wrote:
> On 7 April 2015 at 21:59, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
>> * Trying to rename a sub-branch root:
>> svnmover> mv trunk/sub trunk/A
>> mv: moving by copy-and-delete
>> svnmover: warning: apr_err=SVN_ERR_ASSERTION_FAIL
>> svnmover: warning: W235000: In file 'subversion/libsvn_de
Hi Stefan. Thanks for this set of feedback.
On 7 April 2015 at 21:59, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
[...]
> The only major problem IMO, is that "branchify" is currently
> too destructive: Applied within an existing branch, it seems
> to make merges from & to the respective sub-tree impossible
Yes, indee
Hi Julian,
Here the things that I noticed while playing with svnmover.
I was going for a FSFS / FSX library duplication scenario.
The only major problem IMO, is that "branchify" is currently
too destructive: Applied within an existing branch, it seems
to make merges from & to the respective sub-t
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Bert Huijben wrote:
>> Julian, you can just force the windows Ra bot to build a/this/your branch
>> via IRC if you want to verify if it works now. (The Ra bot uses a shared
>> library build, like Johan's environment. The local bot a static libr
Bert Huijben wrote:
> Julian, you can just force the windows Ra bot to build a/this/your branch
> via IRC if you want to verify if it works now. (The Ra bot uses a shared
> library build, like Johan's environment. The local bot a static library
> version)
Thanks, Bert. That helps. After a couple
;
Sent: 25-3-2015 10:00
To: "Johan Corveleyn"
Cc: "Bert Huijben" ; "dev"
Subject: Re: Playing with svnmover
On 24 March 2015 at 22:50, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> But now I'm running into a new one:
>
> [[[
> svn_ra-1.lib(ra_loader.obj) : error LNK2
On 24 March 2015 at 22:50, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> But now I'm running into a new one:
>
> [[[
> svn_ra-1.lib(ra_loader.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external
> symbol _svn_delta__get_debug_editor referenced in function
> _svn_ra_get_commit_editor_ev3
[...]
> ]]]
>
> I suppose the problem is t
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> Another step further, but now I get this (don't really understand why):
>>
>> [[[
>> libsvn_delta.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
>> svn_editor3__insert_shims
>
> That function is declared in svn_edito
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> Another step further, but now I get this (don't really understand why):
>
> [[[
> libsvn_delta.def : error LNK2001: unresolved external symbol
> svn_editor3__insert_shims
That function is declared in svn_editor3e.h and never defined nor referenced.
Rather than debug why i
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 07:14:57 +:
> It won't be hard to turn it into a tools/dev/ script that automatically
> edits build.conf to add anything that's missing, if anyone thinks that's
> a good idea...
I have in mind a script that developers can run locally before
committin
Bert Huijben wrote on Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 00:44:02 +0100:
> > [[[
> > svn_repos-1.lib(commit.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external
> > symbol _svn_editor3p__insert_shims referenced in funct
> > ion _svn_repos_get_commit_editor5
> > [C:\research\svn\dev\move-tracking-2\build\win32\vcnet-
> > vc
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Bert Huijben wrote:
>> Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> Thanks. I get a bit further now. But now it fails with some linker problems:
>>>
>>> [[[
>>> svn_repos-1.lib(commit.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external
>>> symbol _svn_editor3p__insert_shi
Bert Huijben wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> Thanks. I get a bit further now. But now it fails with some linker problems:
>>
>> [[[
>> svn_repos-1.lib(commit.obj) : error LNK2019: unresolved external
>> symbol _svn_editor3p__insert_shims referenced in funct[...]
>
> I'm guessing this is caused b
> -Original Message-
> From: Johan Corveleyn [mailto:jcor...@gmail.com]
> Sent: donderdag 19 maart 2015 00:32
> To: Julian Foad
> Cc: dev
> Subject: Re: Playing with svnmover
>
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Julian Foad
> wrote:
> > Johan Corveley
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>>> I intend to take a closer look soon. But as you know, my definition of
>>> "soon" is a bit ... vague ;-).
>>>
>>> I greatly appreciate your efforts to get "move support" ... moving in svn.
>>
>> First hurdle: I have
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
>> I intend to take a closer look soon. But as you know, my definition of
>> "soon" is a bit ... vague ;-).
>>
>> I greatly appreciate your efforts to get "move support" ... moving in svn.
>
> First hurdle: I have trouble compiling it (on Windows 7, VS 2013).
> Both with "rel
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 3:15 AM, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> On 13 March 2015, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> Dear fans of move tracking,
>>>
>>> I heartily invite you to help by playing with 'svnmover'. Can you have
>>> a go and see what it can do? It'
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> On 13 March 2015, Julian Foad wrote:
>> Dear fans of move tracking,
>>
>> I heartily invite you to help by playing with 'svnmover'. Can you have
>> a go and see what it can do? It's quite fun to play with (in a nerdy
>> way :-)
>
> One unimplem
On 13 March 2015, Julian Foad wrote:
> Dear fans of move tracking,
>
> I heartily invite you to help by playing with 'svnmover'. Can you have
> a go and see what it can do? It's quite fun to play with (in a nerdy
> way :-)
One unimplemented bit you might come across is 'svnmover merge'
doesn't try
19 matches
Mail list logo
