Re: Performance comparison of svnrdump and svnsync

2011-08-22 Thread Philip Martin
Mark Phippard writes: > I thought I recalled when svnrdump was first created that there were some > timing comparisons made with svnsync that showed it to be faster at doing a > full dump/sync of a remote repository. When I test via HTTP: > > svnrdump dump http://server/repos | svnadmin load rep

Re: Performance comparison of svnrdump and svnsync

2011-08-17 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Could you remind what optimizations those are? Are you suggesting that they could be pushed down into the svn_ra_replay() implementations? Thanks, Daniel Ivan Zhakov wrote on Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 21:28:31 +0400: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 21:20, Mark Phippard wrote: > > I thought I recalled w

Re: Performance comparison of svnrdump and svnsync

2011-08-17 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Hi Stefan, Stefan Sperling writes: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:55:27PM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote: >> I could just be basing it on the original proposal.  Maybe that planted the >> seed with me that it was going to be faster: >> >> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-07/0154.shtml > > The proposa

Re: Performance comparison of svnrdump and svnsync

2011-08-17 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:55:27PM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote: > I could just be basing it on the original proposal. Maybe that planted the > seed with me that it was going to be faster: > > http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-07/0154.shtml The proposal says: "it currently performs significantl

Re: Performance comparison of svnrdump and svnsync

2011-08-17 Thread Mark Phippard
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:20:33PM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote: > > I thought I recalled when svnrdump was first created that there were some > > timing comparisons made with svnsync that showed it to be faster at doing > a > > full dump/sy

Re: Performance comparison of svnrdump and svnsync

2011-08-17 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:20:33PM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote: > I thought I recalled when svnrdump was first created that there were some > timing comparisons made with svnsync that showed it to be faster at doing a > full dump/sync of a remote repository. When I test via HTTP: > > svnrdump dump

Re: Performance comparison of svnrdump and svnsync

2011-08-17 Thread Mark Phippard
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 21:20, Mark Phippard wrote: > > I thought I recalled when svnrdump was first created that there were some > > timing comparisons made with svnsync that showed it to be faster at doing > a > > full dump/sync of a remote

Re: Performance comparison of svnrdump and svnsync

2011-08-17 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 21:20, Mark Phippard wrote: > I thought I recalled when svnrdump was first created that there were some > timing comparisons made with svnsync that showed it to be faster at doing a > full dump/sync of a remote repository.  When I test via HTTP: > svnrdump dump http://serve