On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:55:27PM -0400, Mark Phippard wrote: > I could just be basing it on the original proposal. Maybe that planted the > seed with me that it was going to be faster: > > http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-07/0154.shtml
The proposal says: "it currently performs significantly better than `svnsync` because it doesn't need to touch the filesystem or apply any deltas." I would guess this benefit is probably only measurable with file:// URLs.
