C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 04/12/2013 01:36 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> I'll branch at about 18:30 UTC (less than an hour from now) if all
>> still looks well at that time.
>
> Sounds good.
r1467414: Branch created.
r1467415: Trunk version number bumped.
r1467428: STATUS file added on branch
On 04/12/2013 02:15 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> "C. Michael Pilato" writes:
>
>> We know the branch isn't RC-ready, so if we cut a tarball, it would be
>> "beta1".
>
> What needs to happen to make it RC-ready?
*
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/buglist.cgi?target_milestone=1.8.0&issue_status=
Philip Martin writes:
> "C. Michael Pilato" writes:
>
>> We know the branch isn't RC-ready, so if we cut a tarball, it would be
>> "beta1".
>
> What needs to happen to make it RC-ready?
CHANGES needs to be completed. Anything else?
--
Philip
"C. Michael Pilato" writes:
> We know the branch isn't RC-ready, so if we cut a tarball, it would be
> "beta1".
What needs to happen to make it RC-ready?
--
Certified & Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
On 04/12/2013 01:36 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> I'll branch at about 18:30 UTC (less than an hour from now) if all still
> looks well at that time.
Sounds good.
> The releasing guidelines say to create the CHANGES section for 1.8 on
> trunk after branching, but that was done long ago. In fact, we p
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> Julian Foad wrote:
>>> So shall we get this branch branched very soon? For the sake of making a
>>> decision, I'll suggest that we should try hard to get the things above
>>> resolved by the end of tomorrow, and that even if we don't they are no
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 08:00:30AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> The last thing we need is a new "class" of public APIs with special promises.
I agree, it would add too much extra complexity.
Our API rules are already quite complex.
On 04/10/2013 09:50 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> That's unprecedented, we've never released an API "without compatibility
>> promises". We could do that but that's a separate discussion IMO.
>
> That might be a good idea. How about we introduce a class of public
> APIs, disabled by default (i.e.,
Ivan Zhakov wrote on Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 13:24:32 +0400:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:50 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 02:28:30 +0300:
> >> Ivan Zhakov wrote on Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 23:33:01 +0400:
> >> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Daniel Shahaf
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:50 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 02:28:30 +0300:
>> Ivan Zhakov wrote on Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 23:33:01 +0400:
>> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> > > Ivan Zhakov wrote on Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 21:48:39 +0
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 02:28:30 +0300:
> Ivan Zhakov wrote on Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 23:33:01 +0400:
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > > Ivan Zhakov wrote on Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 21:48:39 +0400:
> > >> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:44 PM, C. Michael Pila
Ivan Zhakov wrote on Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 23:33:01 +0400:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Ivan Zhakov wrote on Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 21:48:39 +0400:
> >> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:44 PM, C. Michael Pilato
> >> wrote:
> >> > On 04/10/2013 12:33 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 5:34 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 11:23 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> > So shall we get this branch branched very soon? For the sake of making a
> > decision, I'll suggest that we should try hard to get the things above
> > resolved by the end of tomorrow, and t
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Ivan Zhakov wrote on Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 21:48:39 +0400:
>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:44 PM, C. Michael Pilato
>> wrote:
>> > On 04/10/2013 12:33 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> >> Right now, trunk has APIs backing an 'svnadmin info' (or 'svn
Ivan Zhakov wrote on Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 21:48:39 +0400:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:44 PM, C. Michael Pilato
> wrote:
> > On 04/10/2013 12:33 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> >> Right now, trunk has APIs backing an 'svnadmin info' (or 'svnlook info')
> >> command but not a UI for them. (Some of them
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:44 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 12:33 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:34:12AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>> On 04/10/2013 11:23 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
So shall we get this branch branched very soon? For the sake of making
On 04/10/2013 12:33 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:34:12AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> On 04/10/2013 11:23 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> So shall we get this branch branched very soon? For the sake of making a
>>> decision, I'll suggest that we should try hard to get the
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:34:12AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> On 04/10/2013 11:23 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>> > So shall we get this branch branched very soon? For the sake of making a
>> > decision, I'll suggest that we should try har
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:34:12AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 11:23 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
> > So shall we get this branch branched very soon? For the sake of making a
> > decision, I'll suggest that we should try hard to get the things above
> > resolved by the end of tomorro
19 matches
Mail list logo
