On 04/10/2013 12:33 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 11:34:12AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> On 04/10/2013 11:23 AM, Julian Foad wrote: >>> So shall we get this branch branched very soon? For the sake of making a >>> decision, I'll suggest that we should try hard to get the things above >>> resolved by the end of tomorrow, and that even if we don't they are not >>> blockers, so: >>> >>> Let's branch on Friday. >>> >>> Any support or objections? >> >> None. In fact, thanks to your email, I had to discard my own draft mail >> which said similar things but suggested we branch on Monday. :-) >> >> (Paul, Bert: If you're watching for that mail from me, it won't get sent >> now -- we can discuss and +1 on this thread just as easily.) >> >> +1 to a Friday branch unless folks raise reasonable objections. > > Right now, trunk has APIs backing an 'svnadmin info' (or 'svnlook info') > command but not a UI for them. (Some of them have unit tests.) I think we > don't want to release with just the half-backed APIs, so we'll have to either > revert them or add a UI for them. As far as I'm concerned reverting is fine, > and I can continue the work on trunk and propose for backport before, say, > beta1.
Either revert or privatize them -- whatever's easiest. Now's really not the best time to be trying to introduce new UI, methinks. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
