On Dec 22, 2009, at 2:26 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote:
>> If the tigris.org issues are fixed, then of course we don't need to do that.
>
> As far as I can tell, tigris.org is fine now. Jack can (please) correct me
> if I'm wrong, but my advice to Hyrum would be carry on wit
Branko Čibej wrote:
> If the tigris.org issues are fixed, then of course we don't need to do that.
As far as I can tell, tigris.org is fine now. Jack can (please) correct me
if I'm wrong, but my advice to Hyrum would be carry on with the original plan.
--
C. Michael Pilato
CollabNet <> www
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>
>>> We've run into a little bit of a problem with the 1.6.7 release. Just as I
>>> was preparing to roll the tarball this evening, Jack Repenning mailed me
>>> indicating there were problems with the Subversion
Branko Čibej wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> We've run into a little bit of a problem with the 1.6.7 release. Just as I
>> was preparing to roll the tarball this evening, Jack Repenning mailed me
>> indicating there were problems with the Subversion instance on tigris.org.
>> As a project,
Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> We've run into a little bit of a problem with the 1.6.7 release. Just as I
> was preparing to roll the tarball this evening, Jack Repenning mailed me
> indicating there were problems with the Subversion instance on tigris.org.
> As a project, we've never used that inst
On Dec 21, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
Personally, I don't like any of them, and am hoping there is still
some way of using Subversion commits to www/. Thoughts?
Well, our adjustments of last night and this morning should put us
back into the same shape as before the changes t
David Glasser wrote on Mon, 21 Dec 2009 at 23:00 -0800:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
> > wrote:
> >> Personally, I don't like any of them, and am hoping there is still some
> >> way of using Subversion commits
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Justin Erenkrantz
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
> wrote:
>> Personally, I don't like any of them, and am hoping there is still some way
>> of using Subversion commits to www/. Thoughts?
>
> I'm not sure what Greg thinks, but if tigris
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> Personally, I don't like any of them, and am hoping there is still some way
> of using Subversion commits to www/. Thoughts?
I'm not sure what Greg thinks, but if tigris.org can no longer act as
a download server, I wouldn't object if we
Jack Repenning wrote:
On Dec 21, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
Personally, I don't like any of them, and am hoping there is still
some way of using Subversion commits to www/. Thoughts?
Some further details might be of interest:
We've just completed applying, as a "hot-fix," seve
On Dec 21, 2009, at 5:58 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
Personally, I don't like any of them, and am hoping there is still
some way of using Subversion commits to www/. Thoughts?
Some further details might be of interest:
We've just completed applying, as a "hot-fix," several of the changes
t
11 matches
Mail list logo
