On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Vladimir Berezniker
> wrote:
> > If someone does not mind explaining. What would be the benefit of having
> > this decision be made by the server vs the client having to request that
> via
> > a explicit paramet
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Vladimir Berezniker wrote:
> If someone does not mind explaining. What would be the benefit of having
> this decision be made by the server vs the client having to request that via
> a explicit parameter on the request?
It's not so much of a benefit as it is a co
If someone does not mind explaining. What would be the benefit of having
this decision be made by the server vs the client having to request that
via a explicit parameter on the request?
Thank you,
Vladimir
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu,
C. Michael Pilato wrote on Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 13:55:15 -0500:
> [1] What happens if [a DAV] client screws up our "repository normal
> format" -- expanding keywords or futzing with newlines -- when
> PUTting a new version today?
The non-RNF form gets committed, I think. Or did we install
On 03/07/2013 12:21 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> Then those proxy servers are already interfering with existing clients,
>> and preventing those clients from reporting capabilities, from storing
>> and fetch file lock metadata correctly, etc.
>
> I think we use different headers for the user agent a
> -Original Message-
> From: C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpil...@collab.net]
> Sent: donderdag 7 maart 2013 17:32
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: 'Gavin Baumanis'; 'jinfroster'; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] implement keywords substitutio
On 03/07/2013 11:27 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> Yeah, I *think* using the "is_svn_client" flag is acceptable. I can't
>> remember now how much weight we attributed to that flag (which is set
>> based on a grep of the User-Agent string). The downside here is that
>> if there happens to be a Subve
> -Original Message-
> From: C. Michael Pilato [mailto:cmpil...@collab.net]
> Sent: donderdag 7 maart 2013 17:23
> To: Gavin Baumanis
> Cc: 'jinfroster'; dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] implement keywords substitution in mod_dav_svn
>
On 03/07/2013 09:58 AM, Gavin Baumanis wrote:
> Ping.
> This thread has received no new comments.
(Thanks, Gavin.)
>> You are right! With this patch SVN client complains on bad checksums...
>> Sorry, didn't test that well.
>> But SVN clients do keywords substitution themselves. The idea was to
>>
On 02/04/2013 09:55 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 06:30 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
>> jinfroster writes:
>>
>>> Add "SVNKeywordSubstitution" per-directory (repository) mod_dav_svn
>>> configuration parameter (default is "Off"). Implement keywords
>>> substitution.
>>
>>> * subversion/
On 02/04/2013 06:30 AM, Philip Martin wrote:
> jinfroster writes:
>
>> Add "SVNKeywordSubstitution" per-directory (repository) mod_dav_svn
>> configuration parameter (default is "Off"). Implement keywords
>> substitution.
>
>> * subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c
>> (set_headers):
>> If parame
jinfroster writes:
> Add "SVNKeywordSubstitution" per-directory (repository) mod_dav_svn
> configuration parameter (default is "Off"). Implement keywords
> substitution.
> * subversion/mod_dav_svn/repos.c
> (set_headers):
> If parameter SVNKeywordSubstitution is On, don't send
> "Conte
12 matches
Mail list logo
