Thanks for the explanation. Given that svnrdump's output, as is, is
semantically correct, and the only issue here is consistency with
svnadmin (which produces a different output with the same semantics),
and that it's more than a trivial bit of work to get the consistency,
+1 for leaving svnrdump
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 22:24:10 +0530:
> > Ok, I think you've misunderstood this. Both of them DO dump the exact
> > same properties. Think of the Prop-delta header as just an extra
> > cosmetic line. In dumpfile v3, everything is a de
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 22:24:10 +0530:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
> > Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:39:57 +0530:
> > > Daniel Shahaf writes:
> > > > * ignore Prop-delta... why?
> > >
> > > This is because svnrdump outputs "Prop-delta
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:39:57 +0530:
> > Daniel Shahaf writes:
> > > * ignore Prop-delta... why?
> >
> > This is because svnrdump outputs "Prop-delta: true" everytime, whether
> > it's really a delta or a delta from /dev/null. This
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote on Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:39:57 +0530:
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
> > * ignore Prop-delta... why?
>
> This is because svnrdump outputs "Prop-delta: true" everytime, whether
> it's really a delta or a delta from /dev/null. This is quite harmless,
> and the logic for omittin
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Shahaf writes:
> > +# Mismatched headers during dumping operation
> > +mismatched_headers_re = \
> > +"Prop-delta: |Text-content-sha1: |Text-copy-source-md5: |" \
> > +"Text-copy-source-sha1: |Text-delta-base-sha1: .*"
> > +
>
> So:
>
> * ignore sha1 because RA doesn't
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote on Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 17:53:12 +0530:
> Hi,
>
> I thought this patch might need a little bit of special attention. Let
> me know quickly if something is obviously wrong with it- as far as I
> know, all tests pass and this patch works as expected. I'm going ahead
> and
Hi,
I've committed this to r998661, but the Subversion bot reports some
breakages. I'm not sure what to make of them though.
-- Ram
8 matches
Mail list logo