On 22.05.2014 16:15, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 21 May 2014 14:11, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> On 20.05.2014 16:19, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>>
>> On 16 May 2014 21:27, Ben Reser wrote:
>> []
>>
>> To that end I'd like to branch no later than June 13th. Please figure out
>> what
>> blockers you have on a
On 21 May 2014 14:11, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 20.05.2014 16:19, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>
> On 16 May 2014 21:27, Ben Reser wrote:
> []
>
> To that end I'd like to branch no later than June 13th. Please figure out
> what
> blockers you have on a 1.9.0 release and have them appropriately flagged
On 20.05.2014 16:19, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On 16 May 2014 21:27, Ben Reser wrote:
> []
>
>> To that end I'd like to branch no later than June 13th. Please figure out
>> what
>> blockers you have on a 1.9.0 release and have them appropriately flagged in
>> the
>> issue tracker by May 23rd. I
On 16 May 2014 21:27, Ben Reser wrote:
[]
> To that end I'd like to branch no later than June 13th. Please figure out
> what
> blockers you have on a 1.9.0 release and have them appropriately flagged in
> the
> issue tracker by May 23rd. I'd like to see us having a decision on what we're
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> Ben Reser wrote:
> > [...] I suggest that we need to start moving towards a 1.9.x branch.
> >
> > We'd planned to defer new development and concentrate on fixes before our
> > branch point [...] I propo
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> Stefan Fuhrmann, can you make a decision on Issue #4146:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4146
>
> Does that still need doing?
>
It hasn't been done but I a hard look at the code and it turned
out to be infeasible without
On 5/19/14, 7:38 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> Rather "1.9.0" still has a bunch of stuff in it that are not blockers, e.g.
> "true rename" and "encrypted password store." So I created a new milestone so
> I could track things that were distinctly blockers as opposed to things that
> were just "wish we ha
On 5/19/14, 5:30 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> What is the difference between the "1.9-blocker" milestone and "1.9.0"
> milestone?
>
> Is one for "branch blockers" and the other for "RC blockers"?
I don't think there is such a thing as a "branch blocker," we can always fix
something after we branch
Ben Reser wrote on Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:27:28 -0700:
> Since tracking these sorts of things in email is rather difficult I
> have made a new 1.9-blocker milestone. Please move bugs that you
> consider a blockers (or file new ones if there isn't one already) for
> a 1.9.0 release against this mi
Ben Reser wrote:
> [...] I suggest that we need to start moving towards a 1.9.x branch.
>
> We'd planned to defer new development and concentrate on fixes before our
> branch point [...] I propose that we start that period now. [...]
>
> There are still numerous outsta
We planned to release a year after 1.8.0, it doesn't look like we're going to
make that. However, we can still manage to a release out with some delay after
that. To that end I suggest that we need to start moving towards a 1.9.x
branch.
We'd planned to defer new development and
11 matches
Mail list logo
