On 5/19/14, 7:38 AM, Ben Reser wrote: > Rather "1.9.0" still has a bunch of stuff in it that are not blockers, e.g. > "true rename" and "encrypted password store." So I created a new milestone so > I could track things that were distinctly blockers as opposed to things that > were just "wish we had". > > If we want we can just shift that stuff to 1.9-consider and use "1.9.0" > instead.
I moved most of the 1.9.0 bugs to 1.10-consider since most of them appear to be things that aren't happening in 1.9. I've moved the things filed under 1.9-blocker to 1.9.0 and removed the 1.9-blocker milestone. Things that aren't necessarily blockers for 1.9.0 but that we want to record as something to fix in 1.9 should be filed against 1.9.1, which I've also made. I suspect for the time being we won't use that milestone, but will start moving things as we triage. Stefan Fuhrmann, can you make a decision on Issue #4146: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4146 Does that still need doing?
