On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> Is this right? Specifying the root folder? I think it is because you
> have a lib and include in it. However, it tells me that BDB is not
> found and the fs will not be built when I run this. Everything else
> seems OK.
It is but it look
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> Yes, started it over from scratch as I was not sure if just re-running
> would be the right thing to do.
>
> In general, what is the process in the future when there are new
> versions of components. Should I be able to just update the versi
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> gen-make.py -t vcproj --vsnet-version=2012
> --with-berkeley-db=c:\Users\breser\svn-trunk-deps
Is this right? Specifying the root folder? I think it is because you
have a lib and include in it. However, it tells me that BDB is not
found and
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>> I am attaching the log file it found. I also searched the
>>> httxt2dbm.vcxproj file, which seems to be the relevant file, and it
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> I am attaching the log file it found. I also searched the
>> httxt2dbm.vcxproj file, which seems to be the relevant file, and it
>> does NOT seem to have that property you set about TrackF
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> I am attaching the log file it found. I also searched the
> httxt2dbm.vcxproj file, which seems to be the relevant file, and it
> does NOT seem to have that property you set about TrackFiles. I note
> this project file is in the support fol
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
>>> Can you look to see that there is a line like this in all the vcxproj
>>> files under modules\proxy\balancers:
>>> false
>>
>> Yes, nex
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:14 AM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
>> Can you look to see that there is a line like this in all the vcxproj
>> files under modules\proxy\balancers:
>> false
>
> Yes, next to last line right before the closing Project tag.
Now I
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> I have Update 2 installed.
>> http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=38188
>
> I've installed update 2, still get a completely finished build.
I started over fresh overnigh
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> I have Update 2 installed.
> http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=38188
I've installed update 2, still get a completely finished build.
Can you look to see that there is a line like this in all the vcxproj
files under modu
I have Update 2 installed.
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=38188
Sent from my iPad
On May 6, 2013, at 7:29 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> I like that the script can be re-run.
>
> Yes, I tried to make it smart enough to
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> I like that the script can be re-run.
Yes, I tried to make it smart enough to avoid redoing work that was
already done.
> The script then started chugging along and building. It looks like it
> failed at the end of building httpd. Not real
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The result is the build-svn-deps-win.pl script that I've commited in r1467714.
>
> This script is far from perfect. It still needs some work on it, but
> it's probably about 90% of the way there to turning setting up a
> Windows development env
n: Ben Reser [mailto:b...@reser.org]
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 14. April 2013 02:46
> An: Subversion Development
> Betreff: Making the Windows Build Easier
>
> As we've discussed previously a big part of the problem in getting the
> Windows build working has been getting the depend
On 14 April 2013 02:46, Ben Reser wrote:
> Unfortunately, it does not work with Visual Studio 2012 Windows
> Desktop Express due to the lack of devenv.(com|exe). However, the
> script is written to produce a the binaries in a way that they can be
> packaged. There's still some work to do here in
On 14.04.2013 20:18, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>> Have you seen:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/brainy/subversion-windeps
>> No I had not. I'd known that you'd done some work but didn't reali
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>> Have you seen:
>>
>> https://github.com/brainy/subversion-windeps
>
> No I had not. I'd known that you'd done some work but didn't realize
> you'd gotten so far.
>
> I'm not sure whic
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> Have you seen:
>
> https://github.com/brainy/subversion-windeps
No I had not. I'd known that you'd done some work but didn't realize
you'd gotten so far.
I'm not sure which approach is better. I see that you've given
yourself standard
On 14.04.2013 02:46, Ben Reser wrote:
> As we've discussed previously a big part of the problem in getting the
> Windows build working has been getting the dependencies built.
> Everyone I've talked to manages to get this done, then has no idea how
> to duplicate what they've done.
>
> This past we
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Ben Reser wrote:
> The result is the build-svn-deps-win.pl script that I've commited in r1467714.
>
> This script is far from perfect. It still needs some work on it, but
> it's probably about 90% of the way there to turning setting up a
> Windows development envi
As we've discussed previously a big part of the problem in getting the
Windows build working has been getting the dependencies built.
Everyone I've talked to manages to get this done, then has no idea how
to duplicate what they've done.
This past week I wanted to use some static analysis tools tha
21 matches
Mail list logo
