Re: [PATCH] Make constructors of JavaHL classes public

2016-04-18 Thread Branko Čibej
On 08.03.2016 22:40, Dmitry Pavlenko wrote: > Yes, it would be enough, thanks! > >> On 08.03.2016 17:35, Dmitry Pavlenko wrote: >>> Hello! >>> I would ask you to make some JavaHL contructors public, so it would be >>> possible to implement JavaHL more easily. Once you were so kind to do >>> that >>

Re: [PATCH] Make constructors of JavaHL classes public

2016-03-08 Thread Dmitry Pavlenko
Yes, it would be enough, thanks! > On 08.03.2016 17:35, Dmitry Pavlenko wrote: > > Hello! > > I would ask you to make some JavaHL contructors public, so it would be > > possible to implement JavaHL more easily. Once you were so kind to do > > that > > > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox

Re: [PATCH] Make constructors of JavaHL classes public

2016-03-08 Thread Branko Čibej
On 08.03.2016 17:35, Dmitry Pavlenko wrote: > Hello! > I would ask you to make some JavaHL contructors public, so it would be > possible to implement JavaHL more easily. Once you were so kind to do that > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201309.mbox/%3c201309041617.25159.

[PATCH] Make constructors of JavaHL classes public

2016-03-08 Thread Dmitry Pavlenko
Hello! I would ask you to make some JavaHL contructors public, so it would be possible to implement JavaHL more easily. Once you were so kind to do that https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201309.mbox/%3c201309041617.25159.pavle...@tmatesoft.com%3E and I'm asking you to do t