On 08.03.2016 22:40, Dmitry Pavlenko wrote: > Yes, it would be enough, thanks! > >> On 08.03.2016 17:35, Dmitry Pavlenko wrote: >>> Hello! >>> I would ask you to make some JavaHL contructors public, so it would be >>> possible to implement JavaHL more easily. Once you were so kind to do >>> that >>> >>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/subversion-dev/201309.mbox/%3C2 >>> 01309041617.25159.pavle...@tmatesoft.com%3E >>> >>> and I'm asking you to do that once again. >> Would it work for you if we make the constructors package-scope instead >> of public? You'd still be able to create the objects in your >> implementation; but the user-facing API really shouldn't allow object >> creation in these cases. >> >> -- Brane
It's been a while ... but this change is on trunk now (r1739704) and will be released in 1.10. If you find any more instances that could profit from a private to package-scope constructor change, please let me know. -- Brane
