Understood, thank you for this clarification.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Mihai Danila writes:
>
> > Just to make sure, is this supposed to be doable in parallel in SVN 1.7,
> > because it doesn't seem to be doable?
> >
> > w
up wc/objects/object
(for a subset of the objects in that directory)
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Mihai Danila writes:
>
> > That's exactly the problem. In SVN 1.6 I was able to run concurrent SVN
> > updates on different directories. Their separate
u should be able to update from any path. I’m not sure if they can run
> “concurrently” though.
>
> ** **
>
> svn [PATH…]
>
> ** **
>
> BOb****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Mihai Danila [mailto:virid...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, Sept
to fix SVN 1.6 so that we might use it and achieve our goal
of updating different portions of the working copy concurrently? Or, is
there some way to run concurrent updates on different areas of an SVN 1.7
working copy that we are not aware of?
Mihai
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Mihai Dan
Thank you Philip. We will upgrade to a newer SVN version.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
> Mihai Danila writes:
>
> > With Subversion 1.6.5, 1.6.13, and I believe Subversion 1.7 also, I
> noticed
> > the following bug, which I first asked about on St
With Subversion 1.6.5, 1.6.13, and I believe Subversion 1.7 also, I noticed
the following bug, which I first asked about on StackOverflow about and had
independently confirmed (
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18114102/strange-svn-behavior-missing-files-when-using-depth-immediates-followed-by-de
6 matches
Mail list logo
