Just to make sure, is this supposed to be doable in parallel in SVN 1.7, because it doesn't seem to be doable?
wc/objects/object1/ (1-2 dozen files) wc/objects/object2/ (1-2 dozen files) ... wc/objects/objectN/ (1-2 dozen files) svn up wc/objects/object<i1> svn up wc/objects/object<i2> ... svn up wc/objects/object<ik> (for a subset of the objects in that directory) On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Philip Martin <philip.mar...@wandisco.com>wrote: > Mihai Danila <virid...@gmail.com> writes: > > > That's exactly the problem. In SVN 1.6 I was able to run concurrent SVN > > updates on different directories. Their separate databases were > updateable > > separately. In 1.7, this is no longer possible. > > Both 1.7 and 1.8 allow concurrent updates but the update targets have to > be a bit further apart than 1.6. Given a working copy layout: > > wc/ > wc/A/ > wc/A/B/ > wc/X/ > wc/X/Y/ > > With 1.6 > > svn up wc/A/B > > locks the whole tree for the explict target wc/A/B plus a lock on the > parent directory wc/A, while 1.8 locks the whole tree for the parent > wc/A. The result is that both 1.6 and 1.8 allow > > svn up wc/A/B > svn up wc/X/Y > > in parallel, but only 1.6 allows > > svn up wc/A > svn up wc/X/Y > > in parallel, and neither allows > > svn up wc/A > svn up wc/X > > in parallel. > > -- > Philip Martin | Subversion Committer > WANdisco // *Non-Stop Data* >
