On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:02 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Thanks for the patch. Committed as r1490221.
>
> -- Stefan^2.
>
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 12:51 AM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>>
Cool, Thanks!
Is SIZE_MAX c89? Should it be APR_SIZE_MAX in utf8proc.h (along with
including svn_dep_compat.h)?
--
Joe
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 11:56 AM, wrote:
> Author: brane
> Date: Wed May 8 18:56:18 2013
> New Revision: 1480406
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1480406
> Log:
> Reintegrate wc-collate-path b
Small (possible?) compatibility improvements: suggest APR_UINT64_C()
instead of ull suffix in subversion\libsvn_subr\cache-membuffer.c.
--
Joe
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 3:34 AM, wrote:
> Author: stefan2
> Date: Tue Apr 30 10:34:26 2013
> New Revision: 1477540
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r14775
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:58 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:25:16AM +, Philip Martin wrote:
>>> Joe Swatosh writes:
>>>
>>> > Okay, thanks for giving me hints on this. As
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 4:03 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:25:16AM +, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Joe Swatosh writes:
>>
>> > Okay, thanks for giving me hints on this. As a matter of fact, my apr
>> > does NOT have a section like thi
k for more help
Again thanks for pointing out to me why it's working for everyone else.
--
Joe
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Joe Swatosh writes:
>
>> Thanks Philip and Bert, perhaps this along with Philip's changes?
>>
>> [[[
&
Thank you! r1461395
--
Joe
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> +1
Thanks!
--
Joe
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 1:34 AM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>>
>> Inspired by Bert's comment in another thread about apr macros
>
>
> Hi Joe,
>
> Thanks for the patch. Committed as 1461030.
>
Inspired by Bert's comment in another thread about apr macros
[[[
Use apr macros to make code more portable.
* subversion/libsvn_subr/cache-membuffer.c
(macros): use APR_UINT64_C instead of ull suffix to define
DEFAULT_MIN_SEGMENT_SIZE, MIN_SEGMENT_SIZE, and MAX_SEGMENT_SIZE.
]]]
Index:
> Bert Huijben writes:
>
>> Isn't there an apr variant of this macro we can/should use?
>>
>> Bert From: Joe Swatosh
>> Sent: 25-3-2013 01:01
>> To: SVN Dev
>> Subject: [PATCH] #include limts.h for ULONG_MAX
>> While I found this issue usi
While I found this issue using my very old compiler, it seems reasonable since
that is where ULONG_MAX has been defined for a long time. (Since clearly no one
else is running into this).
[[[
For those of us with somewhat deficient compilers that don't provide ULONG_MAX
unless is explicitly includ
[[[
Follow up to r1354410 which dropped the JavaHL targets in the absence of a jdk.
It appears to contain an copy-paste-o that also removes the swig targets in
the absence of a jdk.
* build/generator/gen_win.py
(get_install_targets): Drop the line the removes the swig targets when there
is
I've been using VC6 to test the ruby bindings as I haven't yet succeeded in
building with mingw.
It needs this patch:
[[[
Index: build/generator/gen_win.py
===
--- build/generator/gen_win.py (revision 1454760)
+++ build/generator/ge
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Joe Swatosh wrote on Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 15:25:47 -0700:
>> Hi Daniel,
>> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> > joeswat...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 18:28:30 -:
>> >>
Hi Daniel,
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> joeswat...@apache.org wrote on Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 18:28:30 -:
>> Author: joeswatosh
>> Date: Fri Apr 6 18:28:30 2012
>> New Revision: 1310535
>>
>> def test_changelists_get_without_block
>> assert_changelists do |c
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> Philip Martin writes:
>>
>>> There is another failure in the ruby testsuite:
>>>
>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x6
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> *sigh*
>
> I spoke in haste. It turns out my ruby-fu is so weak (and the code is
> question is convoluted by the plethora of yield statements) that I
> feel uncomfortable digging into this in any reasonable timeframe. I
> *think* Daniel's
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Philip Martin writes:
>
>> There is another failure in the ruby testsuite:
>>
>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/4626
>>
>> 1) Failure:
>> test_changelists_get_with_block(SvnClientTest)
>> /var/lib/buildbot/svn-buil
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Hyrum K Wright writes:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Philip Martin
>>>
>>> We fix these by converting the arrays to sets so that the order is
>>> irrelevant. The open question is whether we do this solely within the
>>> testsuite, c
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> There is another failure in the ruby testsuite:
>
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/svn-x64-ubuntu-gcc/builds/4626
>
> 1) Failure:
> test_changelists_get_with_block(SvnClientTest)
> /var/lib/buildbot/svn-buildslave/svn-x64-ubuntu/build/subvers
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
>
>
> I have added an XFail core regression test to svnlook_tests.py. When
> that is fixed we should be able to revert r1293375 and have the Ruby
> tests PASS. We could revert r1293375 now if the Ruby tests have a
> mechanism to mark tests X
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Joe Swatosh writes:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Philip Martin
>> wrote:
>>> Joe Swatosh writes:
>>>
>>> I don't understand why prop_mod is no longer being set.
>>
>>
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Joe Swatosh writes:
>
>> Before r1293375, the node that represented 'diff1.txt' in this walk
>> had the "prop_mod" member set true. After r1293375, the "prop_mod"
>> member for this n
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> Joe Swatosh writes:
>
>> I guess that deleting a property isn't considered a prop_mod on the
>> node anymore?
>
> The property delete is still reported as a property change by the
> Subversi
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Hyrum K Wright
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Hyrum K Wright
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:44
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Philip Martin
>> wrote:
>>> The Ruby bindings are failing during check-swig-rb on the buildbots for
>>> trunk. This
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Philip Martin
> wrote:
>> The Ruby bindings are failing during check-swig-rb on the buildbots for
>> trunk. This has been happening since r1293375, which changed the way
>> property d
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Philip Martin
wrote:
> The Ruby bindings are failing during check-swig-rb on the buildbots for
> trunk. This has been happening since r1293375, which changed the way
> property diffs are reported during replay. As far as I can tell this is
> a problem with the bin
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mat Booth [mailto:mat.bo...@wandisco.com]
>> Sent: maandag 17 oktober 2011 12:26
>> To: Peter Samuelson
>> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Minor patch suggestion:
>>
>> On 14 October 2011
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:02 AM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 5:54 PM, Hyrum K Wright
>>> wro
Hi Bert,
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:54 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Joe Swatosh [mailto:joe.swat...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: woensdag 9 februari 2011 23:43
>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Cc: rhuij...@apache.org
>&g
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:32 AM, wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Wed Feb 9 12:32:57 2011
> New Revision: 1068863
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1068863&view=rev
> Log:
> Following up on r1034362, fix generating the Visual C++ 6.0 style project
> and workspace files. Visual C++ 6.0 is
it.
python gen-make.py -t dsp ^
--with-apr=C:/Users/joe-swatosh/Documents/SVN/src-trunk/svn-build-dependencies/mswin/apr
^
--with-apr-util=C:/Users/joe-swatosh/Documents/SVN/src-trunk/svn-build-dependencies/mswin/apr-util
^
--with-sasl=C:/Users/joe-swatosh/Documents/SVN/src-trunk/svn-build-dependenc
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> I don't see anything specific to windows in that file.
>
> Try changing that line and see what breaks?
>
> Benjamin Jaton wrote on Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 14:36:04 -0800:
>> I can see the ./build/win32/make_gem.rb that specifically set
>> s
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> >
>> > The Ruby tests trigger this error when they try to delete some
>> mergeinfo,
>> > but this error is a few levels deep in some lambda processing so I
>> find it
>> > hard to find out what the expected status should be here.
>> >
>>
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Joe Swatosh [mailto:joe.swat...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: vrijdag 30 juli 2010 3:50
>
> Julian is looking at the issue now.
>
> There is one more issue in the Ruby test
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 6:50 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> Hi Bert (or whoever may look into this before tomorrow),
>
> I was working on two sets of test failures and screwed up on when
> things started. This failure actu
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Joe Swatosh [mailto:joe.swat...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: vrijdag 30 juli 2010 1:46
>> To: dev@subversion.apache.org; julian.f...@wandisco.com
>> Subject: Re: svn co
nsense
setlocal
set svnroot=C:\Users\joe-swatosh\Documents\SVN\local\svn\src-trunk-980466M\
set svn=%svnroot%svn.exe
set svnadmin=%svnroot%svnadmin.exe
set repo=%~pd0repo
set repo_url=file:///%repo:\=/%
set wc=%~pd0wc
if Exist %repo% rd /q/s %repo%
if Exist %wc% rd /q/s %wc%
%svnadmin%
he 1.6.x branch?
>
> Cheers,
> -Hyrum
>
Thanks Joe and Hyrum,
I'm working on getting the bindings to build 1.8.7 on mingw, so I'm
completely distracted and barely keeping up with the list
--
Joe Swatosh
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> This might be related to r948540. Bert adjusted how status->entry is
> filled in. Maybe some kind of lifetime issue?
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 15:28, Hyrum K. Wright
> wrote:
>> Some of you may have noticed that there is a failing ruby bin
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote on Wed, 19 May 2010 at 08:38 -0500:
>> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>
>> > > -Original Message-----
>> > > From: Joe Swatosh [mailto:joe.swat...@gm
Is the Ubuntu Buildbot the only one still sending to
svn-break...@subversion.tigris.org? Is there an apache list somewhere
for watching buildbot results? (None listed on
http://subversion.apache.org/mailing-lists.html).
Thanks,
--
Joe
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:00 PM, wrote:
> Full details are
pr/
http://zlib.net/fossils/
http://serf.googlecode.com/files/
http://www.webdav.org/neon/history.html
http://www.sqlite.org/download.html
(Not in the deps tarball, but a dependency none the less: I've been
using the prebuilt bdb for windows from the tigris site. I'll
probably have to figure out how to build it RSN.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/software/products/berkeley-db/db/index.html).
--
Joe Swatosh
If you have a moment, please add my +1. Thanks.
Sent from my Windows Mobile® phone.
-Original Message-
From: Hyrum K. Wright
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 4:51 AM
To: Joe Swatosh
Cc: C. Michael Pilato ; Subversion Development
Subject: Re: 1.6.10 up for testing/signing
On Sun, Apr 11
Mike and Hyrum,
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 8:11 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>> Thanks for the reminder. Merging the changed suggested here (r876245) does
>>> indeed fix the test failure for me.
>>
>> Joe,
>> I'm happy to +0 this patch, since it fixes the failure for me. I
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 8:11 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>> Thanks for the reminder. Merging the changed suggested here (r876245) does
>>> indeed fix the test failure for me.
>>
>> Joe,
>> I'm happy to +0 this patch, since it fixes the failure for me. I've no idea
>> wh
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Hyrum K. Wright <
> hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>
>> 1.6.10 tarballs are up, the magic revision is r929659:
>>
>> http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.6.10/
>>
>> Download, test, sign and send your
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 7:51 AM, wrote:
> Full details are available at:
> http://crest.ics.uci.edu/buildbot/builders/x64-ubuntu%20gcc/builds/2681
>
> Author list: hwright,rhuijben
>
> Build Slave: x64-ubuntu
>
>
> Subversion Buildbot
> http://crest.ics.uci.edu/buildbot/
>
>
> Last 100 lines of t
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 05:52:46PM -0700, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>> [[[
>> Follow on to r924760 which removed svn_diff_private.h. Remove
>> svn_diff_private.h
>> as a source of exported functions in the windows bui
[[[
Follow on to r924760 which removed svn_diff_private.h. Remove
svn_diff_private.h
as a source of exported functions in the windows build.
]]]
Index: build.conf
===
--- build.conf (revision 925708)
+++ build.conf (working copy)
@
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:12:38PM -0800, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>
> I also highly appreciate Stefan K's feedback. Even though in this thread
> it may have seemed like I was primarily arguing against his points,
> the
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 03:11:06AM +0100, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
>> Stefan Sperling wrote:
>> >>> What is not possible (without adding the --include-pattern option)
>
> It does. You can manually revert the edits 'svn patch' made to the fil
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 01:06, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 21:23, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>>>> Hi Philip
>>>>
>>>>
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 21:23, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>> Hi Philip
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:47 AM, wrote:
>>> Author: philip
>>> Date: Wed Mar 10 16:47:27 2010
>>> New Revision: 921445
>
Hi Philip
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 8:47 AM, wrote:
> Author: philip
> Date: Wed Mar 10 16:47:27 2010
> New Revision: 921445
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=921445&view=rev
> Log:
> Remove some access batons from post-commit processing.
>
>
Since this patch the Ruby bindings test has
Hi Hyrum,
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> Joe,
> Great to see this work happening. Be aware that some of the APIs are still
> moving targets, so some things might break.
>
> -Hyrum
>
With you mentioning elsewhere that a branch could happen as early as
May, I figured
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 4:02 AM, wrote:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Tue Feb 2 12:02:40 2010
> New Revision: 905595
>
> + "Use inetd mode or tunnel mode if you need this.]")},
> #ifdef CONNECTION_HAVE_THREAD_OPTION
> /* ### Making the assumption here that WIN32 never has fork and so
>
Mimic stsp's r905799 to get the build working again.
[[[
Follow-up to r905787:
* build/generator/gen_win.py
(WinGeneratorBase._create_sqlite_headers): Track parameter list change for
transform_sql.main().
]]]
Index: build/generator/gen_win.py
==
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
>
> On Jan 13, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: woensdag 13 januari 2010 15:53
>>
as that
>> when I lost my box a few weeks ago, I also lost the magic combination of
>> deps versions, so just used the most recent versions from the rolling
>> scripts to construct the 1.6.8 deps. If you can detail the difference
>> between the two, that'd be useful.
&g
ol
_inet_aton
..\..\..\Release\subversion\libsvn_ra\libsvn_ra-1.dll : fatal error
LNK1120: 1 unresolved externals
Error executing link.exe.
__SWIG_RUBY__ - 2 error(s), 51 warning(s)
rake aborted!
Command failed with status (2): [C:\Users\joe-swatosh\Documents\SVN/BuildSc...]
MS windows vista
MSVC6 sp6
Feb 2003 SDK
Ruby 1.8.6
--
Joe
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
>
> On Jan 11, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
>
>> "Hyrum K. Wright" writes:
>>
>>> After merging the pending fixes into 1.6.x, I reran the tests. The only
>>> failure was in the ruby bindings:
>>>
>>> [[[
>>> hwri...@orac:~/dev/
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 7:07 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
> After merging the pending fixes into 1.6.x, I reran the tests. The only
> failure was in the ruby bindings:
>
> [[[
> hwri...@orac:~/dev/svn-1.6.x$ make check-swig-rb
> cd /home/hwright/dev/svn-1.6.x/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby; \
I believe these Ruby bindings failures to be specific to the setup of
the svnserve on *nix, because these are the only tests that use
@repos_svnserve_uri. I cannot reproduce on Windows. Can anyone help?
--
Joe
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:06 AM, wrote:
> Full details are available at:
> http://c
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 09:35:23A
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 09:35:23AM -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>>> Please be sure to test
Thanks Gavin, but this patch was made moot by philip fixing the
underlying problem in r891376.
--
Joe
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Gavin 'Beau' Baumanis
wrote:
> Ping.
> This Submission has received no comments.
>
> Gavin.
>
>
> On 13/12/2009, at 03:48 , Joe S
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:25:29AM -0800, Joe Swatosh wrote:
>> This buildbot is still failing the build before the tests are even
>> run. Something to do with libtool?
>
>> /usr/share/apr-1.0/build/libtool: lin
This buildbot is still failing the build before the tests are even
run. Something to do with libtool?
Thanks,
--
Joe
>From the end of the build report:
+ echo '= make swig-rb'
= make swig-rb
+ make swig-rb -j1
/usr/share/apr-1.0/build/libtool --tag=CC --silent --mode=compile non
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 09:35:23AM -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> Please be sure to test the bindings.
>
> Also, a ruby bindings test segfaults.
>
> I've found this in an OpenBSD ports build, hence no debug symbols
> in this trace. I can
This commit causes segfaults in the Ruby bindings client tests around resolve:
test_resolve_baseE
test_resolve_merged .
test_resolve_mine_conflict E
test_resolve_mine_full E
test_resolve_theirs_conflict E
test
Looks like a config error? JDK?
--
Joe
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 12:31 PM, wrote:
> Full details are available at:
> http://crest.ics.uci.edu/buildbot/builders/x86-macosx-gnu%20shared/builds/1969
>
> Author list: hwright
>
> Build Slave: osx10.4-gcc4.0.1-ia32
>
>
> Subversion Buildbot
> http://c
Ruby bindings tests, which have been failing for a long time, are now
passing (as of r891376, thanks Philip!).
There is however a failing Java test.
fyi for those keeping score at home.
--
Joe
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 2:11 PM, wrote:
> Full details are available at:
> http://crest.ics.uci.edu/
[[[
Since the standard Ruby unit test framework has no ability to mark a test as
"XFail," just remove it until it can pass again. Include a request to restore
the test when it should pass again
* subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/test_client.rb
(SvnClientTest#test_mkdir_p): Comment out
*
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 4:54 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
wrote:
>
> On Nov 30, 2009, at 5:21 AM, Julian Foad wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 11:19 +, Julian Foad wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 11:02 +, Philip Martin wrote:
Julian Foad writes:
>> This whole --parents stuff is bon
Hi Hyrum,
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:08 PM, Joe Swatosh wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:25 AM, wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Thu Nov 19 17:25:48 2009
>> New Revision: 882209
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=882209&view=rev
>> Lo
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:25 AM, wrote:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Thu Nov 19 17:25:48 2009
> New Revision: 882209
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=882209&view=rev
> Log:
> When acquiring and releasing wc write locks, use the parent path for unknown
> kinds in the working copy. Update 'a
79 matches
Mail list logo
