On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:38:35 +0100, Branko [UTF-8?]Äibej wrote
> >
> > While it wasn't late at night, I'll blame it on being tired.
> > I *thought* I had included it.
> >
> > The patch is attached to this one. Thanks Phlip!
> >
>
> Apparently you're having trouble sending patches, because not
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:28:04 +0100, Philipp Marek wrote
> Hello Edmund,
>
> On Montag, 21. Dezember 2009, Edmund Wong wrote:
> > I had the mtime specs done but Schrödinger's cat ate it. So I had
> > to restart.
> ...
> > PS: Due to my anxiety, I forgot to incl
it this and brace for whatever happens.
So I humbly submit for everyone's comments.
Edmund
PS: Due to my anxiety, I forgot to include the patch. Silly me.
[[[
The mtime functional specification submission for RFC.
* notes/mtime_specs.txt
Added
Patch by: Edmund Wong ed{_at_}kdtc.net
Suggested by: julianf
]]]
--
it this and brace for whatever happens.
So I humbly submit for everyone's comments.
Edmund
[[[
The mtime functional specification submission for RFC.
* notes/mtime_specs.txt
Added
Patch by: Edmund Wong ed{_at_}kdtc.net
Suggested by: julianf
]]]
--
Branko [UTF-8?]Äibej wrote:
>
>
> I went back to look at them ... and they're not all that cryptic.
> Clearly some types are not defined, it looks like a conflict between
> some defines (e.g., WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN or_WIN32_WINNT) and the order of
> includes.
>
> Not having a Windows dev box handy,
5 matches
Mail list logo
