Branko [UTF-8?]Äibej wrote: > > > I went back to look at them ... and they're not all that cryptic. > Clearly some types are not defined, it looks like a conflict between > some defines (e.g., WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN or_WIN32_WINNT) and the order of > includes. > > Not having a Windows dev box handy, I can't dig any deeper.
PMJI, I raised this issue with Paul over IRC last week and I've been trying to figure it out myself. So basically what you're saying is that the order of the includes was somehow changed? Will check that out when I head home tonight. Edmund
