Daniel Shahaf :
> > > It makes me twitchy that there's any possible future in which that
> > > format might be unsuppoted or inaccessible.
>
> We _are_ committed to providing an upgrade path from 1.x to 2.x, you
> know. Always have been. You can stop twitching.
It's not 1.x I'm worried about be
Julian Foad :
> Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > Reposurgeon can't handle the Version 3 format with deltas, and there
> > is no realistic possibility that this will change because the format
> > is not documented anywhere.
>
> Isn't format 3 documented in the section called "Version 3 format" in
> dump
Den tors 21 jan. 2021 17:16Daniel Shahaf skrev:
> Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2021 07:21 +00:00:
> > Den ons 20 jan. 2021 kl 23:56 skrev Nathan Hartman <
> hartman.nat...@gmail.com>:
> > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:16 AM Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > >> How about linking to mail-archives.
Julian Foad wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2021 15:59 +00:00:
> I can't remember if there is a strong reason why version 2 is not
> implemented in svnrdump. I have a feeling there is at least a
> non-trivial reason. I looked some time in the past and it wasn't simply
> a matter of adding a switch. As far
Eric S. Raymond wrote on 2020-12-22:
> As promised, I have updated notes/dump-load-format.txt with the
> information in the ewplies to my recent query.
Thanks.
[...]
> === Unresolved questions ===
>
> 1. In interpreting a Node record which has both a copyfrom source and
> a property section, it
Den tors 21 jan. 2021 17:18Daniel Shahaf skrev:
> Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2021 07:37 +00:00:
> > Also modified the server setup to redirect any requests for
> > http://svn-haxx.apache.org to https://svn.haxx.se. Only problem now is
> > if someone tries to access https://svn-haxx.apac
Eric S. Raymond wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:23 +00:00:
> I have a (possibly confused) use who says on reposurgeon's IRC support
> channel "we have trouble with broken history in one of our repos and I
> can't create a mirror for it via svnsync, but can create a dump file
> via svnrdump. when I try
Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2021 07:37 +00:00:
> Also modified the server setup to redirect any requests for
> http://svn-haxx.apache.org to https://svn.haxx.se. Only problem now is
> if someone tries to access https://svn-haxx.apache.org, it will give a
> certificate warning. I don't r
Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Thu, 21 Jan 2021 07:21 +00:00:
> Den ons 20 jan. 2021 kl 23:56 skrev Nathan Hartman :
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:16 AM Daniel Shahaf
> > wrote:
> >> How about linking to mail-archives.apache.org, or to a sane third-
> >> party archive? I know lists.a.o is "official"
Nathan Hartman wrote on Wed, 20 Jan 2021 22:56 +00:00:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 11:16 AM Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> > How about linking to mail-archives.apache.org, or to a sane third-
> > party archive? I know lists.a.o is "official" but unless it has
> > changed its spots since I last looked, I
Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> [...]
> Reposurgeon can't handle the Version 3 format with deltas, and there
> is no realistic possibility that this will change because the format
> is not documented anywhere.
Isn't format 3 documented in the section called "Version 3 format" in
dump-load-format.txt?
ht
I have a (possibly confused) use who says on reposurgeon's IRC support
channel "we have trouble with broken history in one of our repos and I
can't create a mirror for it via svnsync, but can create a dump file
via svnrdump. when I try to load it though, it complains about file
format version"
On
12 matches
Mail list logo
